Confederate battle flag: Why South Carolina lawmakers may vote to keep it

South Carolina lawmakers return to the statehouse Monday to officially begin the debate over the Confederate battle flag flying on capitol grounds. 

|
Tami Chappell/Reuters
A Confederate flag flies at the base of a confederate memorial in front of the South Carolina State House in Columbia, South Carolina July 4, 2015.

In the weeks following the shooting at the Emmanuel A.M.E. church in Charleston, S.C., state lawmakers looked poised to remove the controversial Confederate battle flag from the Capitol grounds.

But now South Carolina legislators are returning to the State House to formally debate the issue and the end result may not be as decisive as many expected. 

Republican Gov. Nikki Haley expressed her support for the removal of the flag shortly after the shooting, a move that The New York Times described as a “dramatic turnabout” for the governor who had shown little interest in the issue in past years.  

But some support for keeping the Confederate flag remains.

According to a survey of South Carolina lawmakers by The Post and Courier of Charleston, the needed two-thirds majority of 83 members of the house say, "yes," the flag should be removed, 9 say, "no," 11 are undecided, 16 haven’t responded, and 4 refused to answer. If all of the replies other than “yes” are added together, 31 members of the House could potentially or already do think that the flag should stay.

Although the number is less than half of those that are in favor of removing the flag, The Associated Press suggests that the opposing voices have a significant amount of power. It notes that the last time South Carolina lawmakers debated this issue, they became entangled over the details of what to replace the flag with and where else the Confederate symbol might appear.  

Both the South Carolina Senate Majority Leader and the House Speaker have not taken public positions on the issue. Republican State Sen. Lee Bright is raising money in defense of the flag by selling Confederate flag bumper stickers that say “keep your hands off my flag.” He also began a petition calling for the Confederate flag to be kept at the Capitol. He writes, “Let’s stand together and preserve a piece of our history that symbolizes states’ rights.”

And the response from constituents has also been mixed.

“There are a lot of folks who would like to see the matter resolved and remove the unfortunate spotlight that’s been placed on our state. And there are others who can view it simply as a symbol of heritage and are very upset that we would…’cave in’ to those who would do otherwise,” State Sen. Larry Martin told USA TODAY. 

A recent Suffolk University/USA TODAY poll conducted two weeks after the shooting, found that Americans nationwide are evenly divided on this issue. Forty-two percent said that the Confederate battle flag is a racist symbol and should be removed from state flags and other locations. But 42 percent said the flag is representative of Southern history and heritage and not racist.

However, a CNN/ORC poll released three days later said that 57 percent of Americans see the flag is a symbol of Southern pride rather than racism. Opinions were sharply divergent among different demographic groups: 66 percent of whites said it represented Southern pride, while only 17 percent of African-Americans said it did. 

Some state lawmakers are interested in “a good, long hardy discussion” where all sides of the debate could be heard, as Republican State Rep. Eric Bedingfield told USA TODAY.  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Confederate battle flag: Why South Carolina lawmakers may vote to keep it
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0706/Confederate-battle-flag-Why-South-Carolina-lawmakers-may-vote-to-keep-it
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe