First batch of Hillary Clinton's Benghazi e-mails released

The State Department is expected to release the first batch of Hillary Clinton's e-mails over the next few days. Meanwhile, The New York Times has obtained almost a third of the pages. 

|
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP/File
Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speaking at an event hosted by the Center for American Progress (CAP) and the America Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees in Washington, on March 23, 2015.

The first batch of Hillary Clinton’s e-mails is about to see the light of day.  

On Tuesday, a federal judge rejected the State Department’s proposal to wait until January 2016 to release the more than 55,000 e-mails Mrs. Clinton wrote during her stint as secretary of State, and instead ordered that a “rolling” release of the documents be made every two months. Now, the State Department is expected to release the first batch of emails over the next few days, The New York Times reported.

Around 850 pages of e-mails that relate to Libya and the 2012 attacks on the United States outposts in Benghazi have been given to a special House committee appointed to investigate the attacks. The attacks killed four people, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Meanwhile, the Times has obtained almost a third of the pages set to be released, saying the e-mails contain "sensitive" material, but no classified government information.

“The emails appear to back up Mrs. Clinton’s previous assertions that she did not receive classified information at her private email address,” wrote reporter Michael Schmidt for the Times. “But some of the emails contain what the government calls ‘sensitive’ information or ‘SBU’’ — sensitive but unclassified. This includes details of the whereabouts of State Department officials in Libya when security there was deteriorating during the 2011 revolution.”

This spring, a controversy erupted after it was revealed that Clinton relied exclusively on a personal e-mail account and private "homebrew" server to conduct government business during her term as secretary of State from 2009 until 2013.

In January 2014, a Senate report revealed that the government failed to deliver the “standard of care” needed to protect its staff in Benghazi. The report faulted the State Department, then under Clinton, for failing to respond to intelligence reports that warned of possible security threats prior to the attack. A Republican-led House committee, meanwhile, cleared the CIA and military of wrongdoing.

Now, Republicans and concerned citizens say they hope the e-mails stored on Clinton’s server will provide a greater understanding of what the government knew prior to the attack in Benghazi.   

The e-mails revealed that Clinton relied on Sidney Blumenthal, a senior campaign adviser who was not employed at State, regarding Libya, with Mr. Blumenthal reportedly sending at least two dozen memos on the situation.

“Mrs. Clinton forwarded most of them to Jake Sullivan, her trusted foreign policy adviser," Mr. Schmidt reported. "Mr. Sullivan would then send the memos along to other senior State Department officials, asking for their feedback. There is no evidence those officials were told that the memos were from Mr. Blumenthal.”

Clinton said on Tuesday during a campaign stop that she supported the swift release of her e-mails.

“I want those e-mails out. Nobody has a bigger interest in getting them released than I do,” Clinton told reporters in Iowa. “I want the American people to learn as much as we can about the work that I did.”

To read the 349 pages obtained by the New York Times, click here.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to First batch of Hillary Clinton's Benghazi e-mails released
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0521/First-batch-of-Hillary-Clinton-s-Benghazi-e-mails-released
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe