Obama chooses Kentucky in 2015 NCAA Final Four. Are his picks getting better?

On Wednesday, the president unveiled his choice to win the NCAA tournament. What does his 'bracketology' record look like?

|
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP Photo/File
President Barack Obama waves to members of 2012-2013 NCAA Division I Men’s and Women’s championship teams from several sports on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Monday, March 10, 2014.

The president of the United States has made a decision – about college ball, at least.

In keeping with tradition and his reputation as an avid basketball fan, President Obama sat down with ESPN’s Andy Katz Wednesday to fill out his NCAA tournament bracket for 2015.

His Final Four picks this year are Villanova, Duke, Arizona, and Kentucky, with Kentucky emerging victorious after facing Villanova in the championship.

It’s a pretty safe – you might say, conservative –  pick, and most sports analysts would agree that the University of Kentucky Wildcats are favorites for the title this season, having won every game they’ve played so far for a 34-0 record.

“I don’t think you can play a perfect basketball game any more than you can do anything perfectly,” Mr. Obama told Mr. Katz during their interview. “But these guys are coming pretty close.”

Unfortunately, the same can’t be said of the president’s bracketology record. This is the seventh year Obama has released his picks, and in that time, he’s only ever gotten one champion right: North Carolina in 2009.

Last year the president finished just under the 73 percentile, according to ESPN, when he had Florida, Louisville, Arizona, and Michigan State as his Final Four. Only Florida made it to the semifinals, and he missed out entirely on the winners, the University of Connecticut Huskies.

Granted, UConn pulled out a historic come-from-behind win against Kentucky in the finals. But the result only dragged down the First Fan’s bracketology status. Until then, the president had correctly predicted slightly under 30 percent of Final Four teams, according to The Hill.

In 2013, he predicted that Louisville and Indiana would meet in the title game, with the Hoosiers taking it all. The Cardinals did end up in the finals, but they beat out Michigan for the championship.

Obama, however, appeared confident predicting a perfect season for Kentucky this year.

“The chances are high,” he told Katz, laughing. “They are prohibitive favorites, and for good reason.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama chooses Kentucky in 2015 NCAA Final Four. Are his picks getting better?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0318/Obama-chooses-Kentucky-in-2015-NCAA-Final-Four.-Are-his-picks-getting-better
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe