CBS broken leg replay: Did the network handle it right?

CBS broken leg replay happened twice immediately following the fall by Louisville basketball player Kevin Ware. Sportscasters had to make a rapid decision about airing the footage.

|
Michael Conroy/AP
Trainers check on Louisville guard Kevin Ware (5) after Ware injured his lower right leg during the first half of the Midwest Regional final against Duke in the NCAA college basketball tournament, Sunday, in Indianapolis.

When Louisville basketball player Kevin Ware crumpled to the ground during the first half of his team’s Elite Eight game against Duke Sunday, many viewers hardly saw him fall.

But as play came to a halt, it became clear Ware had suffered an ugly leg break, with bone visible.

That left CBS, the network broadcasting the game, to make a rapid decision about what to do with the graphic scene that had just unfolded.

It’s the kind of choice that falls into a moral gray area for sports broadcasters: Is replaying brutal injury footage exploiting a traumatic situation for shock value? Or is keeping it off the air a paternalistic way of shielding viewers from what’s happening in the arena?

"We did not zoom in on the injury when he was taken off,'' CBS Sports head Sean McManus told the Associated Press just after the game. "We did not try to highlight it. I think we did the right thing.''

Just after Ware fell, CBS showed two quick replays of the injury – and then banished the footage. The network instead focused on the reactions of Ware’s teammates and coaches, and it showed close-ups of his face and upper body. At half time, CBS sportscaster Greg Gumbel said the network wouldn’t show the injury footage again.

As the incident became national news, other media outlets followed suit.

The AP reports,

The unedited video was hard to find on national news outlets within 24 hours, when it was still a fresh news story. CNN aired the sequence, but blurred out Ware's leg so the break was not visible. Fox News Channel and MSNBC did not show the video, representatives said.

ABC's "Good Morning America" showed footage, again with the leg blurred. NBC's "Today" show and the CBS morning news program did not show it.

At ESPN, executives set specific guidelines: Producers had discretion to use it on their own programs but they were to only show it once, not air it in slow motion and warn viewers in advance. Through Monday afternoon, spokesman Josh Krulewitz said he did not believe the network had shown it.

Some commentators, however, noted that it wasn’t difficult for CBS to take the “high road” and stop airing the footage because Internet-savvy viewers knew they could find the replay elsewhere if they wanted to see it.

"If people want to go watch the footage for whatever reason, they have a right to do so," Mr. McManus told the AP. "I just didn't think we had any obligation to be the facilitator of putting that footage back on the screen. We documented it, we described it, and we showed it, and I think that was enough."

As debate over how the network handled the injury rippled outward on the Internet, a loose consensus seemed to emerge.

“CBS handled things on the fly about as delicately as anyone could have managed,” wrote Barry Petchesky on Deadspin. “When offering something as discomfiting as the Kevin Ware replay, viewers deserve as much of a choice as possible.” 

“[T]he video is news, and despite its warts,... sports news station ESPN should show it,” wrote Connor Simpson on The Atlantic Wire. “They should issue a warning before showing it, and exercise some discretion when calculating the number of [times] it's played in a broadcast.”

As Mr. Petchesky notes, CBS had sports broadcast history as a guide when deciding how to handle the Ware footage.

In 1985, Washington Redskins quarterback Joe Theismann suffered a similarly brutal broken leg during a "Monday Night Football" broadcast. In that incident, ABC also chose to show two replays of the event.

But as Petchesky points out, the network's initial discretion did little to stop the footage from becoming the most replayed sports injury ever. 

By Tuesday morning, copies of CBS’s footage of the Ware injury had more than 1 million views on YouTube.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to CBS broken leg replay: Did the network handle it right?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/0402/CBS-broken-leg-replay-Did-the-network-handle-it-right
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe