World Cup openers draw record crowds, even as NZ stunned by shooting

Despite a shooting in Aukland, New Zealand, early Thursday, 2023 Women’s World Cup hosts Australia and New Zealand both drew record crowds to their stadiums for their opening matches. The tournament runs through Aug. 20.

|
Andrew Cornaga/AP
New Zealand's Hannah Wilkinson celebrates after scoring the opening goal during the Women's World Cup soccer match between New Zealand and Norway in Auckland, New Zealand, July 20, 2023. New Zealand won 1-0 in front of the nation's largest soccer crowd ever.

The Women’s World Cup opened Thursday, July 20, in New Zealand and Australia. In an extraordinary upset, New Zealand’s Hannah Wilkinson scored a second-half winner to send her underdog team to a 1-0 win over Norway at Eden Park

The Football Ferns had never won a World Cup match before and Ms. Wilkinson’s goal from close range early in the second half, off a laser-like cross from Jacqui Hand, sent the home fans into roars of delight. The win put New Zealand on the right track toward their goal of getting out of the opening stage of the tournament, as they face debutants the Philippines on Tuesday in a match that has widely been seen as their best chance of winning in Group A.

Australia also won its opening game 1-0 against Ireland.

Both games had record turnouts. Australia-Ireland drew a crowd of 75,784. In New Zealand, 42,137 fans flooded the stadium, the largest soccer audience in the nation ever. Auckland crowds turned out despite a highly unusual shooting that resulted in three fatalities just hours before the match and hundreds of yards away from the stadium. New Zealand and Australia are known for their strict gun laws, and fatal shootings are rare. Security was heightened ahead of the match, and a minute of silence was observed before the start of the game in Auckland.

On the pitch, there could be additional surprises at the Women’s World Cup.

Sure, the United States is still considered dominant, and those elite European teams have developed even more with the rise of competitive clubs. Then there’s Brazil, which always seems on the verge of a breakout.

But an expanded field of 32 teams at the tournament starting Thursday in Australia and New Zealand means more players will see the international spotlight – and they no doubt want to prove they belong.

Consider Japan. 

Back in 2011, Japan wasn’t expected to make the semifinals, let alone the championship match. But the Japanese, reeling from the earthquake and tsunami that devastated their country earlier that year, rallied and beat the Americans on penalties after a 2-2 draw, and in the process became the first Asian team to win soccer’s top prize.

That was the last Women’s World Cup that wasn’t won by the United States. The No. 1-ranked Americans aim to make it three in a row.

U.S. coach Vlatko Andonovski is well aware that other countries are catching up. He pointed to Zambia’s exhibition victory over Germany in the run-up to the tournament.

“The top 10 have always been there. Wales, Vietnam, Zambia, and Portugal – These are the countries that are catching up. The 7-0, 8-0 games are gone. And we can see that when Germany played against Zambia, it lost 3-2. Those games are going to happen,” Mr. Andonovski said. “And that’s what we are preparing ourselves for, so we don’t run into a game like that with the mentality that it’s gonna be easy. No game is gonna be easy. It doesn’t matter who’s in front of us.”

Canada is considered among those top teams, particularly after winning the Olympic gold medal in Tokyo. But coach Bev Priestman suggested that growing parity means there are no givens.

“It could really throw up some surprises just on tournament football, you can lose group-stage games and then go on to win the thing. So yeah, it’s tighter than it’s ever been,” Ms. Priestman said.

There are eight teams debuting at the tournament, including Ireland, Vietnam, Zambia, Haiti, Morocco, Panama, Portugal, and Philippines. While most stand little chance against the likes of France or Sweden, there’s always that hope.

And there’s hope that the international stage will help push federations to invest in more for the teams that don’t traditionally have support.

“A lot of federations are slowly getting into the trend of being better,” South Africa forward Thembi Kgatlana said. “A lot of those girls in those countries have been professional athletes, so they have an idea of what it means to be a professional. And when they go back to the respective national teams, they are able to also help and say, ‘Hey, we need this, we need that.’ It kind of forces the national teams to also adapt into the trends of changing and becoming better.”

More than a game 

Players are well aware that the World Cup gives them the platform to speak about inequity, human rights, and a whole host of social issues.

At the World Cup final four years ago in France, fans chanted “Equal Pay!” in support of the Americans’ fight for equitable compensation to their male national team counterparts. The players struck a contract that equalized pay last year.

Now other teams are joining the call for better pay and conditions. A group of international players, backed by the global players association FIFPRO, called on FIFA to increase prize money and make sure that each player at the tournament gets a share of those funds.

As a result, all 736 players participating in this World Cup will each get at least $30,000, an amount that increases the further teams advance in the tournament. FIFPRO has vowed to make the money gets to the players.

The overall fund for this World Cup is $152 million, covering prize money, team preparation, and payments to players’ clubs. That’s a 300% increase over the funds for the 24-team edition in 2019, and 10 times what it was in 2015.

It’s just a number

It’s hard to say who has had more of an impact on women’s soccer in their home countries: Canada’s Christine Sinclair or Brazil’s Marta. Both players will be making their sixth appearance at the World Cup.

Ms. Sinclair, 40, holds the international scoring record, among both men and women, with 190 career goals. She’s played in 323 games for Canada.

Ms. Marta, 37, a six-time FIFA World Player of the Year, has scored 115 goals for Brazil in 174 appearances. Ms. Marta is the tournament’s all-time leading scorer with 17 goals and will vie to be the first player to score in six World Cups.

They are not the only players to make a sixth World Cup roster: Nigeria’s Onome Ebi, 40, is about a month older than Ms. Sinclair and is the oldest in the tournament.

The kids are all right

Casey Phair, an American-born forward on South Korea’s squad, turned 16 on June 29 and is the youngest person on a tournament roster. She’s one of four 16-year-old players in World Cup squads.

The United States boasts teenager Alyssa Thompson, who plays for Angel City in the National Women’s Soccer League. Just 18, she missed her high school graduation because of soccer.

A look back

The U.S. women ran through a gauntlet of tough teams – first host France in the quarterfinals and then England in the semis – before beating the Netherlands 2-0 in the final to win the 2019 World Cup. Sweden defeated England in the third-place match.

Details, details

The United States opens against Vietnam on Saturday in Auckland, but because of the time difference, viewers in North America will watch on Friday.

The top two teams from each of the eight groups will advance to the knockout stage, which begins on Aug. 5. The championship game is set for Aug. 20.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Material from Reuters was included in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to World Cup openers draw record crowds, even as NZ stunned by shooting
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2023/0720/World-Cup-openers-draw-record-crowds-even-as-NZ-stunned-by-shooting
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe