Skip to footer

Why St. Louis fans see Rams' move to L.A. as 'slap in the face'

Football fans in Los Angeles are elated to have an NFL team return to their city, but Rams fans in St. Louis aren't so thrilled.

|
Cristina M. Fletes/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/AP
Zach Remelius (l.) and Mickey Right stand outside the Edward Jones Dome on Tuesday, in St. Louis. NFL owners voted Tuesday night to allow the St. Louis Rams to move to a new stadium at a site just outside Los Angeles, and the San Diego Chargers will have an option to share the facility.

A 30 to 2 vote by the National Football League (NFL) owners opened the door for the St. Louis Rams to move their franchise to Los Angeles this year, leaving many fans in the Gateway to the West upset over the loss of their pro football team.

The team’s owner, Stan Kroenke, plans to build a stadium in Inglewood, Calif., a proposal approved in the owners’ vote that authorized the Rams’ application for relocation.

While football fans in southern California may be looking forward to the return of a Los Angeles team after a 21-year absence, Rams supporters in the Midwest are not as thrilled about the loss of their team. The Rams played in Los Angeles from 1946 to 1995.

The Ram's owner is a multibillionaire who hasn't been able to come to terms with improvements with the current stadium in St. Louis, and he has a big dream for a new stadium complex in Los Angeles. Mr. Kroenke brought to the NFL owners meeting "finished schematic plans for the world's most interactive and integrated football stadium, a futuristic, $1.86-billion, privately financed venue proposed for the Hollywood Park site in Inglewood," reported The Los Angeles Times. 

Los Angeles has seen impressive renderings before, but hasn't had an NFL football team since 1994. Over the last two decades, several developers have unveiled all kinds of dazzling drawings and slick video presentations of venues that never came to pass.

What makes Kroenke different is that he is an NFL owner, and the league's second-richest owner at that. His team also has a deep and nostalgic connection to L.A., and he — along with development partner San Francisco-based Stockbridge Capital Group — has nearly 300 acres of prime stadium land the league itself tried to buy.

"It is just a slap in the face for the city," Rams fan Jermaine Chambers told Reuters.

"Even though things might not have gone the way he wanted them to, he created the relationship with the city, so it is kind of his fault,” Mr. Chambers said of Mr. Kroenke. "Beyond that he still made money here. To dump on the city, to dump on the people and the community I just think it was classless."

The NFL’s move came after the St. Louis NFL Stadium Task Force, a group made up of St. Louis representatives and several supporting organizations, proposed a new stadium plan based in St. Louis designed to keep the franchise in Missouri.

“Today’s decision by the NFL concludes a flawed process that ends with the unthinkable result of St. Louis losing the Rams,” the group said in a Wednesday release.

“Over the past 15 months, our stadium task force has delivered in every respect to what the NFL demanded of St. Louis to keep our team. More important, over the past 21 seasons, most of them dire, St. Louis has been remarkably supportive of and faithful to the Rams,” the statement continued. “We will leave it to the NFL to explain how this could happen and hope the next city that may experience what St. Louis has endured will enjoy a happier and more appropriate outcome.”

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon also reacted negatively to the NFL’s move, pointing to the St. Louis proposal as justification to keep the team in place in a statement on Tuesday:

Tonight’s decision is disappointing, and a clear deviation from the NFL’s guidelines.  It is troubling that the league would allow for the relocation of a team when a home market has worked in good faith and presented a strong and viable proposal. This sets a terrible precedent not only for St. Louis, but for all communities that have loyally supported their NFL franchises.

Regardless of tonight’s action, the fact remains that St. Louis is a world-class city deserving of a world-class NFL team.  We will review the NFL’s decision thoroughly before determining what next steps to take. In particular, we are interested in their justification for departing so significantly from the NFL’s guidelines after St. Louis had – in record time – presented a proposal for a first-class stadium.

While the team’s relocation seems all but done at this point, the San Diego Chargers could also leave their fanbase behind and join the Rams in the Los Angeles market this year, according to the NFL. The team will have to decide by the end of the March NFL owners’ meeting whether or not to move, and could end up sharing the proposed Inglewood arena with the Rams. If the Chargers stay put, the Oakland Raiders – the third team that applied for an L.A. relocation – could have an option to move in with the Rams as well.

Material from Reuters was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Why St. Louis fans see Rams' move to L.A. as 'slap in the face'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2016/0113/Why-St.-Louis-fans-see-Rams-move-to-L.A.-as-slap-in-the-face
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe