Are Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden both bitten by 'Schrödinger’s cat'?

The phrase 'Schrödinger’s cat' has had more than nine lives, not just in quantum physics but also in the language of political analysis, especially recently. 

|
Alan Diaz/AP
Vice President Joe Biden gestures as he talks to students and guests at Miami Dade College in Miami on Wednesday. Vice President Biden traveled to Florida to support Senate Democrats and the administration's education agenda, amid speculation that he may be considering a run for the Democratic presidential nomination.

“Schrödinger’s Cat.” In quantum physics, a famous thought experiment describing a cat that might be both alive and dead in a box; in politics, shorthand for someone or something caught in a strangely paradoxical situation.

As Vice President Joe Biden ponders whether to enter the presidential race, FiveThirtyEight.com statistician and political analyst Nate Silver has observed that Biden while could be an attractive candidate, he would have serious logistical difficulties to overcome. But, he said, Biden can’t really enter the race until it becomes clear that Hillary Clinton’s effort is doomed.

“Biden is left running a Schrödinger’s cat campaign, neither wholly in the race or wholly out of it,” Silver concluded.

Meanwhile, government-secrecy expert Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists recently weighed in on the scandal surrounding Clinton over whether she ever sent or received classified e-mails.

“There is a Schrödinger’s Cat aspect to classification. In other words, there is a lot of government information that is neither classified nor unclassified until somebody actually looks at it and makes a determination one way or another,” Aftergood told Foreign Policy. “The argument seems to be that [Clinton] did not knowingly or negligently mishandle classified information.”

Both ends of the political spectrum have appropriated it for their own ends. Left-leaning blogger Josh Sager charged that the experiment applied to the entire Republican Party policy platform.

“The GOP adopts ideas and policies that it portrays as the alternative to the Democrats’ proposals, yet they will turn on a dime and decry their own ideas as soon as the Democrats agree to them – in this, the GOP simultaneously agrees and disagrees with its own policies, depending upon whether the Democrats decide to compromise (their policy positions exist in a state of superposition),” he wrote.

Meanwhile, on the conservative blog RedState, contributor Moe Lane in 2011 made fun in a headline of the Obama administration’s efforts to pass a jobs bill that had not yet been written: “Democrats: Pass the Schrödinger’s Job Bill!”

More recently, political humorist Alexandra Petri used the phrase to reference to a media-insider joke – “crucial Waukesha County,” a Wisconsin place where, on two separate occasions, votes came in that ended up switching the previously thought-of result in a race. In a mock list of political-campaign laws of physics, Petri referred to “Schrödinger’s Rule: Campaign is both alive and dead until the votes from crucial Waukesha County have been observed.”

Chuck McCutcheon and David Mark write their "Speaking Politics" blog exclusively for Politics Voices.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Are Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden both bitten by 'Schrödinger’s cat'?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2015/0902/Are-Hillary-Clinton-and-Joe-Biden-both-bitten-by-Schroedinger-s-cat
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe