Chief Justice Roberts lifts 'inartful' to new heights

'Inartful' – along with its linguistic cousins 'counterproductive' and 'I misspoke' – has long been a fixture in politics. But with the Supreme Court's majority decision preserving Obamacare, the term gains new luster in Washington's lexicon.

|
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Jessica Ellis (r.) holds a sign that says 'yay 4 ACA,' as she and other supporters of the Affordable Care Act react with cheers as the opinion for health care is reported outside of the Supreme Court in Washington on Thursday.

Inartful: The polite political word for “dumb,” especially when an elected official and/or his or her spokespeople grope to explain something they said earlier.

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts’s opinion in the King v. Burwell case essentially preserving the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) shed new light on the art of “inartful.” Roberts wrote that the original law “contains more than a few examples of inartful drafting,” which he and five other justices said necessitated the court to step in and uphold the creation of the state exchanges that the law established.

But “inartful” – along with its linguistic cousins “counterproductive” and “I misspoke” – has long been a fixture in politics. The late language expert William Safire noted in 1985 that “artful” originally meant “adroit,” then evolved into being synonymous with crafty or wily. “Thus, with artful meaning ‘wily,’ inartful would mean ‘not wily’ and would be a compliment,” Mr. Safire wrote. However, to use it as another way of saying “I goofed” – as New York Gov. Mario Cuomo did at the time – “makes no sense,” Safire added. “Depending on his specific intent, he could have chosen insensitive, cruel, thoughtless or even impolitic.”

In 2008, Ben Smith, then of Politico, wrote that it “is becoming a bit of a favorite campaign word” after Barack Obama refused to rebuke Gen. Wesley Clark for saying that Arizona GOP Sen. John McCain’s military experience wasn’t relevant to the presidency. And conservatives jumped on Obama for being inartful in 2014 when the president said “we don’t have a strategy yet” for dealing with Islamic militants.

More recently, Republican Scott Walker’s evasion of a British reporter’s question about whether he believed in evolution prompted this headline from Washington Post opinion columnist Richard Cohen’s castigation of the Wisconsin governor: “Walker’s Inartful Dodge in London.” Another Republican, Ben Carson, in walking back an earlier assertion endorsing the ownership of semi-automatic weapons for people who live “out in the country somewhere by yourself,” called that comment “perhaps a little inartful.”

Hillary Clinton also turned to the word in the aftermath of the furor she caused last year when she lamented that she and her husband were “dead broke” upon leaving the White House in 2001. “I shouldn’t have said the five or so words that I said, but my inartful use of those few words doesn’t change who I am, what I’ve stood for my entire life, what I stand for today,” Mrs. Clinton told PBS.

“Inartful” has been used sporadically in congressional debates over the last two decades, according to the Sunlight Foundation’s ever-helpful CapitolWords.org. Democrats have deployed it slightly more often than Republicans.

Chuck McCutcheon and David Mark write their "Speaking Politics" blog exclusively for Politics Voices.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Chief Justice Roberts lifts 'inartful' to new heights
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2015/0626/Chief-Justice-Roberts-lifts-inartful-to-new-heights
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe