Poll shows US split over Bowe Bergdahl swap. A red flag for Obama?

Forty percent of US voters back Obama's decision to trade POW Bowe Bergdahl for five Taliban prisoners; 43 percent don't, an early poll shows. That's not a resounding 'hurrah' from Americans, signaling widespread uneasiness.

|
Voice Of Jihad Website via AP video/AP
US soldier Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl sits in a vehicle guarded by the Taliban in eastern Afghanistan.

Americans are fairly evenly split over whether President Obama should have swapped five Taliban prisoners to free captured Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in Afghanistan. That’s the (very preliminary) conclusion one can draw from a snap poll on the question, in any case.

According to the just-released Rasmussen Reports survey, 40 percent of likely voters agree with Mr. Obama’s decision to make the trade. Forty-three percent disagree with that decision. The poll’s margin of error is plus or minus three points, according to Rasmussen, so that makes the outcome essentially a tie.

The usual caveats apply here. This is just one poll, and results may vary – the average of a series of different polls would be best, but we don’t yet have them in this case. Also, Rasmussen uses robocall systems to collect its data, and some statistics experts say that methodology is not the best. Noted.

We would guess that other surveys will at least be in the same stadium as Rasmussen when their numbers come in on this question. And the fact is that a split result on a hostage release is probably not good news for Obama administration officials. Almost half the nation may not be overjoyed they’ve brought home a captured soldier, which means the surrounding circumstances – questions about Bergdahl’s loyalties, worry about the high price paid – are weighing on the minds of a substantial number of Americans.

Underlying this may be a question on which we have more substantial polling: Americans’ attitudes toward the US presence in Afghanistan in general. In some ways, Bergdahl has perhaps become a symbol of the frustration many Americans feel about the stubborn Afghanistan war.

Gallup’s trend line on this question is sobering. In 2002, 93 percent of respondents said it was not a mistake to send US troops to Afghanistan. That was the high point. Since then it’s been a steady slope downward, and in February for the first time more respondents thought the Afghanistan war was an error than did not.

Forty-nine percent say it was a mistake, 48 percent say it was not, in Gallup’s February survey, its latest on the question. (The margin of error is plus or minus four points, if you’re interested.)

The partisan split on this question is fairly large, though. Republican and Republican-leaning respondents continue to approve of the Afghanistan campaign, with 62 percent rating it “not a mistake.” The comparable figure for Democrats and Democratic leaners is 40 percent.

“Republicans’ higher levels of support may be related to a Republican president’s initiation of the war, or an ideological inclination to support military involvement,” writes Frank Newport. Gallup editor in chief.

Other polls ask the Afghanistan question in slightly different ways but end up with approximately the same split. A February Pew survey found that 52 percent of Americans agree that the US has mostly failed to achieve its goals in Afghanistan as the end of its military involvement in that country approaches.

Only 38 percent say the US has mostly succeeded.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Poll shows US split over Bowe Bergdahl swap. A red flag for Obama?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2014/0604/Poll-shows-US-split-over-Bowe-Bergdahl-swap.-A-red-flag-for-Obama
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe