Obama fundraiser at Sarah Jessica Parker's house: How'd it go?

The $40,000-a-plate event chez Sarah Jessica Parker raised plenty of cash, but also raised eyebrows, feeding conservative criticism that the 'celebrity-in-chief' is out of touch with needs of struggling families.

|
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP/File
In this Feb. 25, 2010, file photo, President Obama, not pictured, acknowledges actress Sarah Jessica Parker, as first lady Michelle Obama smiles, in the East Room of the White House in Washington before he presented the 2009 National Medal of Arts and National Humanities Medal.

The first couple attended a much-promoted fundraiser in Manhattan Thursday night at the home of actress Sarah Jessica Parker. So how did that go? Did the combined star power crash the West Village power grid? Did President Obama raise (tasteful) basketsful of cash? Did first lady Michelle Obama steal the show?

No, yes, and yes. That’s what it seems from the report of pool journalists who accompanied the president, in any case. We can’t write from personal experience because due to a postal glitch our personal invite went to Meryl Streep instead.

First of all, very famous people did attend the $40,000-per-person event. The aforementioned Ms. Streep was there, for instance. Co-host Anna Wintour, Vogue editor, helped preside over the event.

But George Clooney, Tom Hanks, Eddie Murphy, and the ghosts of Marilyn Monroe and Cary Grant weren’t there. Bravo’s Andy Cohen was. In other words, there weren’t lots of people so famous that average voters would be able to identify them on sight.

The pool reporter, who probably does not read Vogue as if it were Mike Allen’s Playbook (that’s an inside reporter joke), was not sure who many of the people seated at the two long tables in Ms. Parker’s brownstone were.

“There were many attractive people seated at the tables, but your pooler sadly did not recognize them,” they wrote.

Still, 50 guests at $40,000 each can produce a lot of cash, even if they haven’t all done "Today Show" guest spots. Do the math, and you get a sum of  ... worth the Obamas' time.

But reading between the lines of the pool report, it seems to us that the real star of the evening was Mrs. Obama.

Here’s how the actress who played Carrie Bradshaw welcomed her. “It is a great, a rare, a very special and I’m assuming a singular treat to welcome you into our home – our radiant, our extraordinary first lady,” said Ms. Parker, gesturing toward Mrs. Obama, who was seated next to her.

Only then did she turn to Mrs. Obama’s husband, calling him the “beloved current and future president of the United States.”

Of course, the whole setup was tilted in Mrs. Obama’s favor – one co-host edits a fashion magazine, the other plays a character who loves shoes. That’s not an NBA playoff-watching demographic.

Parker noted that her husband, Matthew Broderick, was absent, for instance, saying he had to perform in a show. As if. We’d wager that he and Joe Biden were in the basement man cave playing darts and watching the Mets.

Anyway, Republicans have been criticizing this event, saying that it shows how out of touch Obama is. He’s acting all celebrity-in-chief at a time when the US needs a chief-executive-in-chief. Or something like that.

Conservatives made fun of the president for talking about his plans for the middle class (“Still a lot of people hurting out there,” said Obama) in front of a group of folks who mingle with the middle class only when it’s serving them dinner.

“While rubbing elbows with New York’s rich and famous Obama paused to remember the Americans suffering under his economy, how sweet,” noted a poster on the conservative Twitchy entertainment website.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama fundraiser at Sarah Jessica Parker's house: How'd it go?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2012/0615/Obama-fundraiser-at-Sarah-Jessica-Parker-s-house-How-d-it-go
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe