Debt ceiling 101: 12 questions about what's going on

The US Treasury has warned that as early as Oct. 17 it will no longer be able to cover all the government's rising financial obligations. Here’s your guide to the debt limit deadline and its implications.

9. What are the Treasury’s options if Congress does not raise the debt limit?

Jonathan Ernst /Reuters/File
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew (l.) told the Economic Club of Washington in September that waiting until the last minute to raise the nation's debt limit could lead to irrevocable damage to the economy.

The Treasury can use some extraordinary measures to postpone default. One example is underinvesting in certain government funds. But Treasury officials say they can’t use gimmicks to delay a day of reckoning for very long.

Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said that “once the final extraordinary measures are exhausted, no later than Oct. 17, we will be left to meet our country’s commitments at that time with only approximately $30 billion. This amount would be far short of net expenditures on certain days, which can be as high as $60 billion.”

This would be uncharted territory. As Secretary Lew put it, “it would be impossible for the United States of America to meet all of its obligations for the first time in our history.”

At that point, some finance experts say, the Treasury should prioritize how it uses the funds that come in from tax revenues, so that interest on Treasury bonds is paid before other obligations.

But the Treasury would still have to limit or delay payment of other obligations ranging from salaries to hospital payments under Medicare. Financial markets might view that as a serious breach of trust. Lew has called it “default by another name.” And the Treasury’s systems are so vast that an effort to pay some bills but not others could be chaotic.

The first 20 business days after the Treasury hits its wall would see about one-third of all federal bills (by dollar volume) go unpaid, according to an estimate by the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington. That would represent some $106 billion in missed payments.

9 of 12

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.