Mitt Romney's five biggest assets as GOP nominee

Typically, an election with an incumbent president on the ballot is a referendum on him. But President Obama is trying to turn the election into a choice, saying in effect that America's problems will get much worse under the other guy. So what does Mitt Romney bring to the table? Here are five assets. 

5. 'Romneycare'

Brian Snyder/Reuters/File
Mitt Romney signs into law 'Romneycare,' a Massachusetts health-care reform bill, at Faneuil Hall in Boston in April 2006, when he was state governor.

As the model for President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, Romney’s health-care reform as governor of Massachusetts was poison during the GOP primaries. Most Republicans object to the reform’s mandate for individuals to purchase insurance, which parallels Obama’s reform. Romney’s insistence on defending the reform as a state’s prerogative, which makes it different from federal reform, frustrated conservatives who wished he would apologize for his “mistake.”  

Now that Romney is the presumptive GOP nominee, most Republicans will vote for him despite the reform. “Anybody but Obama” is the new measure. But there’s a case to be made for “Romneycare” as a plus with swing voters in the general election. His ability to work with the heavily Democratic legislature in Massachusetts hits on a theme that a lot of centrist voters come back to: They’re sick of the hyper-partisanship in Washington and want someone who can work across the aisle. And in Massachusetts, at least, the reform is popular.

Romney’s championing of health-care reform also shows voters that he knows how to tackle a complicated social problem and think creatively about a solution. Women voters, in particular, care about the social safety net, and Romneycare could be an avenue into their hearts. Of course, Romney has promised that, as president, he would oversee the repeal of “Obamacare,” if the US Supreme Court doesn’t strike it down first. But as a “fixit man,” he can argue that he will fashion a replacement. 

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.