Musk risks political fallout by endorsing Trump. Few CEOs are following. 

|
David Swanson/Reuters
Tesla CEO Elon Musk looks on during the 2024 Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California, May 6, 2024.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 4 Min. )

As an uber entrepreneur, Elon Musk has blazed many trails in new technology. When it comes to politics, the path he’s forging may turn out to be a lonely one.

In the past month, the CEO has endorsed former President Donald Trump, then walked back a reported pledge of $45 million per month to the Republican nominee, saying the initial report was “simply not true.’’ He has vowed to fight the “woke mind virus” of gender transitions. And he has argued on X, the social media platform where Mr. Trump was suspended but later reinstated, that the Democratic Party has drifted too far left.  

Why We Wrote This

CEO Elon Musk has blazed many trails, including weighing in on politics, in contrast with many executives’ desire to avoid snares this election year.

Such overt political activity stands in sharp contrast with many American chief executives’ reluctance to get politically entangled this election year. Until Mr. Musk’s move, no Fortune 100 executive had donated to the former president’s current campaign. 

The reason: The risk to the reputations of themselves and their companies is becoming too great. 

As an uber entrepreneur, Elon Musk has blazed many trails in new technology. When it comes to politics, the path he’s forging may turn out to be a lonely one.

In the past month, the CEO has endorsed former President Donald Trump,  then walked back a reported pledge of $45 million per month to the Republican nominee, saying the initial report was “simply not true.’’ He has vowed to fight the “woke mind virus” of gender transitions. And he has argued on X, his social media platform, that the Democratic Party has drifted too far left.  

Such overt political activity stands in sharp contrast with many American chief executives’ reluctance to get politically entangled this election year. Until Mr. Musk’s move, no Fortune 100 executive had donated to the former president’s current campaign. 

Why We Wrote This

CEO Elon Musk has blazed many trails, including weighing in on politics, in contrast with many executives’ desire to avoid snares this election year.

The reason: The risk to the reputations of themselves and their companies is becoming too great. 

“Many are quite cautious,” says Bruce Freed, president and co-founder of the Center for Political Accountability, a nonprofit advocacy organization in Washington. “CEOs are looking to keep doors open” with both Republicans and Democrats.

Mr. Musk may be feeling the heat himself. On Tuesday, his electric vehicle (EV) company, Tesla, reported the lowest profits in five years. The slump has many causes, including slower-than-expected growth industry-wide and increased competition from carmakers with newer models. Some analysts worry that Mr. Musk’s political activity is also hurting the company, turning off liberal-leaning car buyers, who up to now have been Tesla’s bread-and-butter customers.

Eduardo Munoz/Reuters
Tesla electric vehicles are parked at a Tesla dealer in Paramus, New Jersey, July 23, 2024. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has endorsed Donald Trump.

His preferred candidate, Mr. Trump, has vowed to end federal EV subsidies on the first day of his administration. 

Endorsement risks and rewards

In the weeks since his felony convictions and the assassination attempt on his life, the Republican presidential nominee has picked up several big endorsements, including one from billionaire hedge fund CEO Bill Ackman, who joined Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman and venture capitalist David Sacks in supporting the former president. But chief executives of consumer-facing companies have traditionally been more reluctant to take sides because of the Michael Jordan dictum: “Republicans buy sneakers, too.”

Avoid politics, avoid turning off customers, the basketball superstar and Nike sneaker icon famously said to explain his decision not to endorse a Democrat in a 1990 U.S. Senate race. Increasingly, CEOs appear to be heeding that advice, with Mr. Musk being the exception who proves the rule.

As late as 2012, nearly 30% of the Fortune 100 CEOs donated to the Republican presidential candidate, according to Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, president of the Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute. By 2020, it was less than 5%. This year, it was zero until Mr. Musk came along.

The risks of a consumer backlash are rising. In 2019, when Home Depot co-founder Bernie Marcus backed Mr. Trump’s reelection campaign, the home-improvement chain tried to distance itself from the comments, pointing out that Mr. Marcus had retired as CEO years before. Mr. Marcus’s subsequent pro-Trump remarks have sparked repeated calls from consumers for a boycott of Home Depot. Research suggests that such boycotts rarely mobilize much consumer support.

Politics, social media, and consumer backlash 

Last year, however, consumers on the right found success in fighting what they call “woke” capitalism, specifically pro-LGBTQ+ company actions. When Bud Light launched a limited ad campaign featuring transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney, a consumer boycott reduced sales and caused the brand to lose its position as the nation’s most popular beer. It is now No. 3. 

Similarly, a 2023 consumer backlash against Target’s Pride month marketing campaign, which included the display of transgender swimwear, caused the retailer to restrict this year’s Pride campaign to online sales and select stores.

How much of Target’s change of heart was due to lost sales remains an open question. “A lot of the challenge for Target was the fact that employees felt unsafe in the stores,” says Nien-hê Hsieh, a professor of business administration at Harvard Business School. “There were serious threats to employees.”

Richard Brian/Reuters/File
Hedge fund CEO Bill Ackman, shown speaking during the SALT conference in Las Vegas, May 18, 2017, has endorsed Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

CEOs and profit margins

Mr. Musk sounded a similar anti-LGBTQ+ theme in an interview published Tuesday where he said he lost his son to “the woke mind virus” after the son came out as transgender. The same day, he denied a report that he would give the Trump campaign $45 million a month, saying his donations would be much lower. 

Mr. Musk’s activities have clearly hurt X (formerly Twitter) since he bought it in 2022. Advertisers and users have dropped away, and revenues have plunged. What’s not clear is how much of that is due to Mr. Musk's changes to the platform versus his political moves (he reactivated Mr. Trump’s Twitter account after it was permanently suspended following the Jan. 6 Capitol riots). Time will tell whether a similar fate awaits Tesla.

Several surveys suggest that the EV maker has suffered reputational damage, especially among Democrats. A Bloomberg survey of more than 5,000 Tesla Model 3 owners last year found that many were disenchanted with Mr. Musk. Still, 87% said they were thinking about buying a Tesla the next time around. Mr. Musk argues that the end of federal EV subsidies would hurt his competitors much more than Tesla.

“A fundamental responsibility of leaders is to bring people together,” David Bach, soon to be president of Swiss business school IMD, writes in a recent California Management Review article. “CEO political activism can be [a] potent tool in this respect. Yet in the face of deep stakeholder division on a salient issue, this leadership imperative cautions against taking sides.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Musk risks political fallout by endorsing Trump. Few CEOs are following. 
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2024/0726/CEO-Musk-Trump-endorsement-political-risk
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe