El Paso gunman who took 23 lives sentenced to 90 life sentences

The Texas gunman who killed 23 people in a racist attack in 2019 at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, has been sentenced to 90 consecutive life sentences for over 50 hate crime charges. A separate trial could still result in a death penalty sentence.

|
Briana Sanchez/AP/File
El Paso Walmart shooting suspect Patrick Crusius pleads not guilty during his arraignment in El Paso, Texas, Oct. 10, 2019. Mr. Crusius pleaded guilty to over 50 federal hate crime charges and was sentenced on July 7, 2023 to serve 90 consecutive life sentences.

A white gunman who killed 23 people in a racist attack on Hispanic shoppers at a Walmart in a Texas border city was sentenced Friday to 90 consecutive life sentences but could still face more punishment, including the death penalty.

Patrick Crusius, 24, pleaded guilty earlier this year to nearly 50 federal hate crime charges in the 2019 mass shooting in El Paso, making it one of the United States’ largest hate crime cases.

Mr. Crusius, wearing a jumpsuit and shackles, did not speak during the hearing and showed no reaction as the verdict was read. U.S. District Judge David Guaderrama recommended that Mr. Crusius serve his sentence at a maximum security prison in Colorado.

Mr. Crusius still faces a separate trial in a Texas court that could end with him getting the death penalty for carrying out one of the deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history.

“We’ll be seeing you again, coward,” a family member of one of the victims shouted from the gallery as Mr. Crusius was led from the courtroom. “No apologies, no nothing.”

Police say Mr. Crusius drove more than 700 miles from his home near Dallas to target Hispanics with an AK-style rifle inside and outside the store. Moments before the attack began, Mr. Crusius posted a racist screed online that warned of a Hispanic “invasion” of Texas.

In the years since the shooting, Republicans have described migrants crossing the southern U.S. border as an “invasion,” waving off critics who say the rhetoric fuels anti-immigrant views and violence.

Mr. Crusius pleaded guilty in February after federal prosecutors took the death penalty off the table. But Texas prosecutors have said they will try to put Mr. Crusius on death row when he stands trial in state court. That trial date has not yet been set.

Joe Spencer, Mr. Crusius’ attorney, told the judge before the sentencing that his client has a “broken brain.”

“Patrick’s thinking is at odds with reality … resulting in delusional thinking,” Mr. Spencer said.

Mr. Crusius became alarmed by his own violent thoughts, Mr. Spencer said, including once leaving a job at a movie theater because of those thoughts. He said Mr. Crusius once searched online to look for ways to address his mental health and dropped out of a community college near Dallas because of his struggles.

Mr. Spencer said Mr. Crusius had arrived in El Paso without a specific target in mind before winding up at Walmart.

“Patrick acted with his broken brain cemented in delusions,” Mr. Spencer said.

The sentencing in El Paso followed two days of impact statements from relatives of the victims, including citizens of Mexico and a German national. In addition to the dead, more than two dozen people were injured and numerous others were severely traumatized as they hid or fled.

One by one, family members used their first opportunity since the shooting to directly address Mr. Crusius, describing how their lives have been upended by grief and pain. Some forgave Mr. Crusius. One man displayed photographs of his slain father and insisted that the gunman look at them.

Bertha Benavides’ husband of 34 years, Arturo, was among those killed.

“You left children without their parents, you left spouses without their spouses, and we still need them,” she told Mr. Crusius.

During the initial statements from victims, Mr. Crusius occasionally swiveled in his seat or bobbed his head with little sign of emotion. On Thursday, his eyes appeared to well up as victims condemned the brutality of the shootings and demanded Mr. Crusius respond and account for his actions. At one point, Mr. Crusius consulted with a defense attorney at his side and gestured that he would not answer.

Mr. Crusius’ family did not appear in the courtroom during the sentencing phase.

The attack was the deadliest of a dozen mass shootings in the U.S. linked to hate crimes since 2006, according to a database compiled by The Associated Press, USA Today, and Northeastern University.

Before the shooting, Mr. Crusius had appeared consumed by the nation’s immigration debate, tweeting #BuildtheWall and posts that praised then-President Donald Trump’s hardline border policies. He went further in his rant posted before the attack, sounding warnings that Hispanics were going to take over the government and economy.

As the sentencing phase got underway, some advocates for immigrant rights made new appeals for politicians to soften their rhetoric on immigration. Republicans, including Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, have pushed for more aggressive actions to harden the southern U.S. border.

Ian Hanna, an assistant U.S. attorney who prosecuted the government’s case, said Mr. Crusius had embraced the “insidious lie” that America only belonged to white people.

“He wanted to eliminate a class of people,” Mr. Hanna said. “It was a strike at the very essence of what makes this community so special.”

Amaris Vega’s aunt was killed in the attack and her mother narrowly survived. In court, Ms. Vega railed at Mr. Crusius’ “pathetic, sorry manifesto” that promised to rid Texas of Hispanics.

“But guess what? You didn’t. You failed,” she told him. “We are still here and we are not going anywhere. And for four years you have been stuck in a city full of Hispanics. ... So let that sink in.”

Margaret Juarez, whose 90-year-old father was slain in the attack and whose mother was wounded but survived, said she found it ironic that Mr. Crusius was set to spend his life in prison among inmates from racial and ethnic minorities. Others in the courtroom applauded as she celebrated their liberty.

“Swim in the waters of prison,” she told Mr. Crusius. “Now we’re going to enjoy the sunshine. … We still have our freedom, in our country.”

The people who were killed ranged in age from a 15-year-old high school athlete to several elderly grandparents. They included immigrants, a retired city bus driver, teachers, tradesmen including a former iron worker, and several Mexican nationals who had crossed the U.S. border on routine shopping trips.

Two teenage girls recounted their narrow escape from Mr. Crusius’ rampage as they participated in a fundraiser for their youth soccer team outside the store and said they are still fearful in public. Parents were wounded and the soccer coach, Guillermo Garcia, died months later from injuries in the attack.

“He was shot at close range by a coward and there was his innocent blood, everywhere,” said Kathleen Johnson, whose husband David was among the victims. “I don’t know when I’ll be the same. … The pain you have caused is indescribable.”

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Paul J. Weber reported from Austin, Texas.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to El Paso gunman who took 23 lives sentenced to 90 life sentences
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2023/0707/El-Paso-gunman-who-took-23-lives-sentenced-to-90-life-sentences
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe