'Providers are protected': New Mexico bill defends abortion rights

New Mexico has taken steps to strengthen abortion access after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling overturned a woman’s decision to end a pregnancy as a constitutional right. Legislators advanced a bill defending providers from out-of-state interference. 

|
Javier Gallegos/Santa Fe New Mexican/AP
New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham speaks during a conference, Jan. 25, 2023, at the State Capitol in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Ms. Grisham joined a group of 20 governors this week in launching a network intended to strengthen abortion access.

A New Mexico legislative panel advanced a bill to protect abortion providers and patients from out-of-state interference, prosecution, or extradition attempts, as Democratic leaders seek to shore up existing rights to abortion access for residents as well as visitors from states with bans on the procedure.

A 5–3 vote on partisan lines with Republicans in opposition sent the bill to a second committee hearing before it can go to a full Senate vote. Legislators have until March 18 to send the bill to Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, who won reelection last year on pledges to safeguard abortion access.

Ms. Grisham joined a group of 20 governors this week in launching a network intended to strengthen abortion access in the aftermath of a U.S. Supreme Court decision nixing a woman’s constitutional right to end a pregnancy and shifting regulatory powers to state governments.

A bill from New Mexico legislators, including Democratic state Sens. Linda Lopez of Albuquerque and Brenda McKenna of Corrales, would provide new legal protections for local abortion providers and recipients – prohibiting any related discrimination by local medical licensing boards and banning or limiting cooperation by New Mexico state and local government with out-of-state interests that try and interfere with reproductive health care.

“We want to make sure that our providers are protected so that they are not criminalized by Texas or some other state,” Ms. Lopez told a Senate panel.

Public prosecutors can file civil charges linked to interference with reproductive health care, with fines for convictions of up to $5,000 per violation, and $10,000 for attempting to circumvent some provisions. Individuals can sue independently for damages.

“What we don’t want to see in our state ... is providers paranoid when they do their jobs, and patients paranoid,” said Kat Sánchez of Bold Futures, a New Mexico-based abortion rights group.

The New Mexico state House on Tuesday endorsed companion legislation that would ensure statewide access to reproductive and gender-affirming health care on a 38-31 vote. At least two counties and three cities in eastern New Mexico recently approved restrictions on abortion under ordinances that are being challenged by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez.

Both bills extend similar protections to gender-affirming health care as abortion. Gender-affirming health care is defined broadly in the bills as “psychological, behavioral, surgical, pharmaceutical, and medical care, services and supplies provided to support an individual’s gender identity.”

More than a dozen states have bills to prohibit gender-affirming health care for young people being brought before legislatures this year. Some seek to ban treatment for gender dysphoria – which is defined as the distress caused by a person’s gender assigned at birth not matching the gender with which they identify – until the person is in their 20s.

Republican state Sen. Gregg Schmedes of Tijeras, a surgeon by profession, cautioned New Mexico Senate colleagues Wednesday against writing into law a “specific health care model” concerning gender-affirming care, and expressed fear of an ideological divide on medical care.

“We have to learn how to live together. We have to be neighbors with Oklahoma and Texas,” Mr. Schmedes said. “This bill kind of scares me in a way that we’re headed toward that national divorce that people are talking about.”

In 2021, New Mexico’s Democrat-led Legislature passed a measure to repeal a dormant 1969 statute that outlawed most abortion procedures, ensuring access to abortion after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Providers are protected': New Mexico bill defends abortion rights
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2023/0223/Providers-are-protected-New-Mexico-bill-defends-abortion-rights
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe