Skip to footer

Meet the 5 most bipartisan politicians in Congress

These five politicians were ranked as the most bipartisan members of Congress by The Lugar Center’s 2015 Bipartisan Index.

The Lugar Center, based out Georgetown University’s McCourt School of Public Policy, developed the ranking based on the number of bills cosponsored with members from the opposite party.

Two trends stand out:

  1. Republican members of Congress scored higher than their Democratic counterparts, with 61 Republicans and 39 Democrats.
  2. The most bipartisan lawmakers come from politically competitive districts, according The Cook Political Report.

That is no coincidence. In districts that lean heavily Democratic or Republican, the election is essentially won at the primary. To prove themselves as the best Democrat or the best Republican for the job, the candidate promises ideological extremes to potential voters. And once elected, the candidate then feels obligated to fulfill their partisan promises in Washington.

Conversely, a politically competitive district is more likely to send bipartisan politicians to Washington – men and women who have reached out to voters across the aisle.

1. Sen. Susan Collins (R) of Maine

Susan Walsh/AP
Attorney General Loretta Lynch, center, is welcomed on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, May 7, 2015, prior to testifying before the Senate subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies hearing to examine the proposed budget estimates for fiscal year 2016 for the Justice Department. From left are, the subcommittee's ranking member Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., Lynch, subcommittee Chairman Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala, and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine.

Sen. Susan Collins has served as a Republican senator for the state of Maine since 1997.

According to GovTrack’s ideological map, she is the most moderate Republican in the Senate. While Senator Collins opposes higher taxes and Obamacare, she also supports more liberal issues such as same-sex marriage, campaign-finance reform, and stronger background checks for gun purchases and renewable energy.

“The main thing Susan Collins does is … her homework, so when she’s talking for example about what to do about terrorists with guns, she’s usually the best informed senator in the room and everyone listens to her,” Sen. Lamar Alexander (R) of Tennessee told the Monitor’s Francine Kiefer. “That helps her when she’s working across the aisle, and that helps her when she’s working in our caucus.”

Collins is also respected for her accountability. Since her inauguration, Collins has missed zero of the 6,223 votes held during her tenure.

According to a 2015 Morning Consult poll, the Maine senator has a 78 percent approval rating, ranking as the second most popular senator behind Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) of Vermont.

1 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.