House passes bill to circumvent Calif. order that insurers cover abortion

The US House of Representatives passed a bill that would counter a California order requiring health insurance companies to pay for elective abortions.

|
Mario Anzuoni/Reuters/File
An activist holds a rosary while protesting abortion outside City Hall in Los Angeles, Calif. in 2015. The US House of Representatives passed a bill that would go against the Obama administration's upholding of a California order requiring insurance providers to cover abortions.

The US House of Representatives has supported legislation that would counter a California order requiring heath insurance companies to pay for elective abortions unless the company itself has moral objections, with GOP Congress members arguing that the rule violates a "right of conscience." 

The Conscience Protection Act is unlikely to become law under the Obama administration, which upheld the California requirement last month, after complaints from anti-abortion advocates in the state. The Department of Health and Human Services dismissed complaints that the order for insurance companies to cover elective abortions violated the Weldon Amendment, which is meant to protect health care providers opposed to abortion.

The bill passed 245-182 on Wednesday, most along party lines, as the Associated Press reports. 

The insurance companies in question did not object to covering abortion, but provided insurance to some employers who do, such as Catholic universities. Under the California requirement, companies' plans must cover elective abortion, unless the insurer itself has objections, regardless of whether particular companies who purchase insurance from the insurer have objections. 

When the California Department of Managed Health Care notified seven insurance providers in 2014 they were in violation of the order, the universities and the insurance companies decided to comply, but several anti-abortion groups brought the order to court, claiming it violated the Weldon Amendment. The amendment blocks federal funding from states that do not allow "health care entities" to abstain from performing abortions, or assisting in performing them. 

"We wouldn't force non-smokers to buy cigarettes for themselves or others. We wouldn't force vegetarians to buy meat. And we shouldn't force those who oppose abortion to pay for abortions," House majority leader Kevin McCarthy (R) of California told the Associated Press.

Former Rep. David Weldon (R) of Florida, whom the amendment is named after, wrote an essay in Politico this week arguing that "the administration's interpretation of the Weldon Amendment is clearly in defiance of the intent and the language of the law." The phrase "health care entities" was purposefully used to extend the amendment beyond doctors, Mr. Weldon writes. 

The Obama administration, however, ruled in June that as the health insurance providers had been providing abortion to their other customers, and did not have objections of their own, they did not fall under the "right of conscience" statue.

Democrats who opposed the House bill said that providers' rights to object were already covered. They also said that the bill allow physicians who object to abortion to withhold medical information if they thought that information could lead the patient to seek an abortion. 

"Women have the same rights to access to health care as men do, and no boss should be able to deny them that right," said Rep. Jim McGovern (D) of Massachusetts. 

This report contains material from the Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to House passes bill to circumvent Calif. order that insurers cover abortion
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2016/0714/House-passes-bill-to-circumvent-Calif.-order-that-insurers-cover-abortion
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe