Why Bill Clinton’s clash with Black Lives Matter won't affect Hillary’s black vote

Despite confrontations with the Black Lives Matter activists, Hillary Clinton still commands a strong support among black voters, including in the upcoming polls.

|
Ed Hille/The Philadelphia Inquirer via AP
Former President Bill Clinton has a heated exchange with a protester during a rally for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Thursday April 7, 2016, in Philadelphia. Bill Clinton was interrupted by people in the crowd holding signs reading "Clinton crime bill destroyed our communities" and "Welfare reform increased poverty."

At a rally in support of Hillary Clinton ahead of Pennsylvania's Democratic primary, former president Bill Clinton clashed with the protestors of the Black Lives Matter movement in the latest flare-up between its activists and Mrs. Clinton's campaign trail.

Holding several signs against the former president's crime policies, which the protesters say are responsible for incarcerating a disproportionate number of African-Americans, the protestors interrupted Mr. Clinton's speech to criticize Mrs. Clinton's support of a crime bill enacted during his own presidency in the mid-1990s. "Clinton's crime bill destroyed our communities," one sign read.

"I don't know how you would characterize the gang leaders who got 13-year-old kids hopped up on crack and sent them out onto the street to murder other African-American children," Mr. Clinton told the protesters, alluding to the activists' criticism of speech his wife gave in 1996 in which she referenced the term "superpredators" –coined by John DiIulio, a professor at Princeton, and used to describe increasing number of young African-American men who committed high-end crimes without any seeming remorse. She apologized for the statement in February.

"Maybe you thought they were good citizens. [Hillary] didn't....You are defending the people who killed the lives you say matter. Tell the truth," Mr. Clinton added.

Since she started her campaign, Mrs. Clinton has had to confront the consequences of the crime bill, often encountering Black Lives Matter protesters at campaign rallies, where they demand an explanation as to why she endorsed the tough-on-crime measure.

Yet she continues to be popular among black voters. In the recent primaries she commanded a stronger support than her Democratic rival Sen. Bernie Sanders among African-Americans, often by double-digit margins.

And the confrontation in Philadelphia may have caused a widespread outrage among the activists and other Clinton critics, but it's unlikely to have a significant impact on her command of the African-American vote in the upcoming primaries. Clinton leads Senator Sanders among Maryland's black voters by 63 percent to 33 percent in a new Washington Post–University of Maryland poll, and by 66 to 31 percent in New York in one from Quinnipiac University. 

While many activists blame Mrs. Clinton for some of the misfortunes facing African-Americans today, a majority of black voters do not. Part of the reason, as The Christian Science Monitor's Henry Gass wrote in March, is that "black communities are aware that for decades they [themselves] were some of the loudest advocates for tough drug laws."

"Black Lives Matter is made up of very young people who are not aware of the situation that was going in the 1980s and 1990s," California resident Jackie Reid tells the Christian Science Monitor in a telephone interview. "People in large cities remember what it was like at that time. Everybody wanted something to be done, and they all supported the three-strikes law to stop the crimes."

"That's something these young people don't know. I think that young people need to be educated about the history, because that's what's lacking," she says, adding that Mrs. Clinton's use of the word "superpredators" was in reference to how bad the situation was.

The measure, which was enacted in the mid-1990s, received a bi-partisanship support at the time. It was endorsed by African-American leaders and community members who saw it a solution to the era's high crime rates, the Monitor reported.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Bill Clinton’s clash with Black Lives Matter won't affect Hillary’s black vote
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2016/0408/Why-Bill-Clinton-s-clash-with-Black-Lives-Matter-won-t-affect-Hillary-s-black-vote
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe