Eliot Spitzer, Anthony Weiner stage political comebacks. Redemption overload?

Not long ago New York Democrats Eliot Spitzer and Anthony Weiner seemed to have killed their political careers with sex scandals. Now, each is attempting a comeback, but will New Yorkers forgive and forget?

|
Paul Drinkwater/NBC/AP
Former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer with host Jay Leno during a taping of "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno," Friday, July 12, 2013, in Burbank, Calif. Spitzer, who resigned as governor in 2008 amid a prostitution scandal, is now running for New York City comptroller.

Two New York Democrats. Two sex scandals. Two attempts at political rejuvenation.

It wasn’t long ago that Elliot Spitzer and Anthony Weiner – the former governor and the former congressman – had reason to hang their heads in shame, not only for their personal failings but because their ambitions to advance politically seemed dashed.

Mr. Spitzer, a married man, was found to have purchased the service of high-priced prostitutes. Mr. Weiner had sent lewd photos of himself to women (other than his wife) who he had flirted with on the Internet.

Now, each feels ready to reenter the world of electoral politics. Spitzer is running for New York City comptroller, Weiner for mayor of New York. The state’s primary election is in September.

In the mayor’s race, Weiner has pushed to the lead among a group of Democratic contenders. He edges New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn 25-20 percentage points among registered Democrats in the latest Marist Poll with the rest of the hopefuls trailing off.

“The Weiner candidacy has scrambled the contest,” says Lee Miringoff, director of The Marist College Institute for Public Opinion. “But, nearly one in five Democrats are undecided, and almost two-thirds are not firmly committed to a candidate which makes for a lot of persuadable voters.”

Most of Weiner’s former colleagues in the House of Representatives have rejected his request for endorsement.

"I don't think he's one of the most qualified candidates and I think his record is not such that we ought to be considering him for mayor," Rep. Jerrold Nadler, (D) of New York, said on C-SPAN. "He's entitled to run. I wish he hadn't."

On the PBS Newshour Friday night, anchor Judy Woodruff asked New York Times columnist David Brooks and syndicated columnist Mark Shields whether Spitzer and Weiner had the right to try and make a political comeback.

“Yes, but my rule is start at the bottom,” said Mr. Brooks. “So, I am little more pro-Spitzer.”

“If you are going to have a fall from grace, start at the bottom and work your way back up,” Brooks said. “Show you care about the service, rather than just rebuilding your reputation.”

“Don’t confuse the two,” cautioned Mr. Shields.

“Both of them were ambitious, young, nervy, loved cameras, loved attention. Anthony Weiner was a show horse. Anthony Weiner was a talk show creation,” Shields said.

“Eliot Spitzer [as New York attorney general before he became governor] was the only political figure in the United States who dared to take on Wall Street,” Shields continued. “And very rarely do you see a politician take on the deepest pocket, most powerful moneyed interests. And he did it, from Goldman Sachs on.”

“What he did to his family was terrible and disgraceful. What he did to the office was too,” Shields said. “But he is a different public servant. And he really deserved to be the sheriff of Wall Street.”

Being that kind of sheriff may have been popular at the time, but his more recent comments about at least one Wall Street titan have brought Eliot Spitzer a spot of legal bother.

On Friday, former American International Group (AIG) chief executive Maurice "Hank" Greenberg sued Spitzer for defamation.

The suit accuses Spitzer of conducting “a long-standing malicious campaign ... to discredit Mr. Greenberg and damage Mr. Greenberg’s reputation and career, while attempting to bolster Mr. Spitzer’s own reputation and career.”

Greenberg led AIG for nearly four decades before his ouster in 2005. The following year, the insurer paid $1.64 billion to settle federal and state probes into its business practices.

Spitzer, who has gathered enough signatures to appear on the primary ballot, where he faces Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, dismisses the Greenberg lawsuit as “frivolous.”

"I will be happy to discuss the relevant facts in the days ahead,” he said in a statement emailed to Reuters.

At the moment, Spitzer leads Mr. Stringer by nine percentage points (42-33 with a substantial 24 percent undecided) in a Marist Poll out this week.

Spitzer has said he would ask New Yorkers to forgive the sordid episode in his past. Will they buy it?

“Right now, New York City Democrats are willing to give Spitzer a second chance, but the big question is what happens after the shock value of his return to politics fades and the campaign for comptroller heats up,” says Mr. Miringoff of the Marist Poll. “Having just recently gone down a similar path with Anthony Weiner, Democrats may reach redemption overload for one or both of these candidates.”

New York City mayoral candidate John Liu says he’s “appalled” that disgraced lawmakers Spitzer and Weiner are running for public office again.

“They're going around asking for redemption while the women whose lives they've affected can never go back,” Liu said Wednesday during an online online chat with Daily News readers. “Ultimately it's up to the voters.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Eliot Spitzer, Anthony Weiner stage political comebacks. Redemption overload?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2013/0713/Eliot-Spitzer-Anthony-Weiner-stage-political-comebacks.-Redemption-overload
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe