NSA surveillance foiled 'dozens' of terror plots, agency chief says

The head of the NSA faced questions about the agency's surveillance program during congressional testimony Wednesday. He said the program has been 'critical' to national security.

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Gen. Keith Alexander, director of the National Security Agency, answers questions from lawmakers on Capitol Hill in Washington Wednesday. It is his first public appearance before Congress since revelations that the electronic surveillance agency is sweeping up Americans' phone and Internet records in its quest to investigate terrorist threats.

The US government’s top-secret phone call-monitoring programs revealed in leaks to the media have helped to foil “dozens” of terrorist attacks on US soil, according to the head of the National Security Agency (NSA).

On Capitol Hill Wednesday for a previously scheduled hearing to discuss cyberoperations, Gen. Keith Alexander, the head of the NSA, argued to lawmakers that the secret surveillance program has been “critical” to national security.

That said, the clandestine agency is also endeavoring to be “transparent” with the American people, General Alexander assured lawmakers.

One closely-watched exchange came when Sen. Patrick Leahy (D) of Vermont challenged Alexander about the provisions of the Patriot Act, as well as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which have allowed the NSA to collect information including phone and e-mail records of Americans.

“We’ve had a number of comments and proposals in the judiciary committee to improve these provisions, but the intelligence community has told us that really we obviously don’t have the ability as simple senators to know anything as well as you do, and so they do not need changes,” a skeptical Senator Leahy said. “I’m told they are critical to our counterterrorism efforts – Congress shouldn’t tinker with them at all.” 

Leahy added, however, that now he wasn’t so sure that the “trust” lawmakers has placed in the NSA to date has been particularly “wise.”

Instead, he proposed, “We should actually debate [the provisions] in a free and open society.”

The hearing made it clear that the Obama administration is eager to make the case that the program is “critical” to national security – and to appear transparent.

Alexander noted that he is trying to get permission to release at least some examples of the ways in which the phone surveillance program revealed by The Guardian last week is helping to thwart terrorist attacks.

“I want the American people to know that we’re being transparent here,” Alexander said. “It’s dozens of terrorist events that these have helped prevent.”

The NSA head cited a case involving the plot to bomb the New York City subway system, in particular, which he said was disrupted by the provision which allows the NSA to monitor telephone communications. 

“In fact, not just critical,” Alexander said of the provision. “It was the one that allowed us to know it was happening.”

Leahy, for his part, countered out that perhaps “dozens” of thwarted terrorist events didn’t merit the collection of data from “millions” of Americans.

"Now, we collect millions and millions and millions of records through 215" – the provision that allows the government to collect the telephone records of Americans – "but dozens of them are proved crucial?" Leahy asked. “Is that right? Dozens?”

To drive home the point, Leahy repeated the question. “Out of those millions, dozens have been critical?”

“That’s correct,” Alexander answered.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to NSA surveillance foiled 'dozens' of terror plots, agency chief says
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2013/0612/NSA-surveillance-foiled-dozens-of-terror-plots-agency-chief-says
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe