Obama: Compromise or 'political conquest'?

In a magazine interview, President Obama says Democrats are more willing to compromise than Republicans. But Rep. Paul Ryan, a leader among young Republicans, says Obama wants 'to fight us every step of the way politically.”

|
William B. Plowman/REUTERS
U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), who chairs the House Budget Committee, was on NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday. He says President Obama is "looking to go farther to the left, and he wants to fight us every step of the way politically.”

As he moves into his second term, President Obama says he’s going to spend more time communicating directly with the American people – something he acknowledges having done too little of during his first term – while working to present his administration and most congressional Democrats as willing to compromise on important issues.

“I've been spending a lot of time just thinking about how do I communicate more effectively with the American people?” Mr. Obama said in an interview with the New Republic magazine. “How do I try to bridge some of the divides that are longstanding in our culture? How do I project a sense of confidence in our future at a time when people are feeling anxious?”

Obama acknowledges that Democrats have “got a lot of warts, and some of the bad habits here in Washington when it comes to lobbyists and money and access…”

“But when it comes to certain positions on issues, when it comes to trying to do what's best for the country, when it comes to really trying to make decisions based on fact as opposed to ideology, when it comes to being willing to compromise, the Democrats, not just here in this White House, but I would say in Congress also, have shown themselves consistently to be willing to do tough things even when it's not convenient, because it's the right thing to do,” he continued. “And we haven't seen that same kind of attitude on the other side.”

That’s certainly not the perception of leading Republicans in Congress, particularly in the wake of an inauguration speech in which Obama was loud and clear on such favorite liberal themes as gun control, gay rights, and climate change.

“When you saw his speech, say, at the inauguration, it leads us to conclude that he’s not looking to be moderate, that he’s not looking to move to the middle,” Rep. Paul Ryan said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday. “He’s looking to go farther to the left, and he wants to fight us every step of the way politically.”

"All of [Obama’s] statements and all of the comments lead me to believe that he's thinking more of a political conquest than a political compromise,” Ryan said, echoing House Speaker John Boehner’s recent comment that Obama wanted to “annihilate” the GOP. He also gave a back-handed compliment to Hillary Clinton, the retiring Secretary of State who – very conceivably – could face off against Ryan in a run for the presidency in 2016.

“If we had a Clinton presidency, if we had Erskin Bowles chief of staff of the White House, or president of the United States, I think we would’ve fixed this fiscal mess by now,” Ryan said. “That’s not the kind of presidency we’re dealing with right now.”

Like Obama, Ryan acknowledged his party’s need to attract a wider range of voters by communicating in a way that addresses peoples’ personal needs and concerns.

“We have to expand our appeal to more people and show how we’ll take the country’s founding principles and apply them to the problems of the day to offer solutions to fix our problems,” he said. “We have to show our ideas are better at fighting poverty. How our ideas are better at solving health care. How our ideas are better at solving the problems people are experiencing in their daily lives and that’s a challenge we have to rise to, and I think we’re up for it.”

Ryan hinted at one controversial issue on which he might agree with Obama: The need for stricter regulations on gun registration, including background checks.

“The question of whether or not a criminal is getting a gun is a question we need to look at,” he said. “We need to look into making sure there aren’t big loopholes where a person can illegally purchase a firearm.”

On guns, Obama pointed to the differences in perception in Democrat-leaning urban areas and rural areas more likely to vote Republican – something he said his party often fails to do.

“I have a profound respect for the traditions of hunting that trace back in this country for generations. And I think those who dismiss that out of hand make a big mistake,” he told the New Republic.

“Part of being able to move this forward is understanding the reality of guns in urban areas are very different from the realities of guns in rural areas. And if you grew up and your dad gave you a hunting rifle when you were ten, and you went out and spent the day with him and your uncles, and that became part of your family's traditions, you can see why you'd be pretty protective of that,” he said. “So it's trying to bridge those gaps that I think is going to be part of the biggest task over the next several months. And that means that advocates of gun control have to do a little more listening than they do sometimes.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama: Compromise or 'political conquest'?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2013/0127/Obama-Compromise-or-political-conquest
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe