Pentagon proposals seek to retain critical talent. What's up for discussion?

The latest efforts by US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter to modernize the military bureaucracy focus on the promotion system, which currently has strict requirements for the attainment of higher rank within given timeframes.

|
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks during an August news conference at the Pentagon. Secretary Carter is expected to roll out sweeping new proposals aimed at keeping high-tech experts or other specialists on the job on Thursday.

Defense Secretary Ashton Carter is to announce Thursday the most groundbreaking installment yet in his campaign to address the military’s antiquated bureaucracy.

Sweeping new proposals will attack the entrenched “up or out” promotion system whereby employees are often forced out of the organization if they fail to achieve a higher rank within a given timeframe.

The fundamental aim behind this particular reform is to provide more flexibility, allowing such rules to be bypassed when necessary, rather than abolishing the traditional structure. In particular, it targets specialists and high-tech experts, seeking to retain them rather than require them to leave at the behest of an arcane system, when their services could still be valuable.

While there is general support for the provision of greater flexibility, some military leaders emphasized that there are situations where the old rules make sense, such as for fighter pilots or certain combat command positions.

Many of the proposals will need congressional approval, and one idea likely to encounter opposition is the suggestion of giving civilian employees six weeks’ paid paternal leave to cover the birth or adoption of a child. Carving out a special arrangement such as this just for the Defense Department could prove challenging, but harder still would be winning approval for a change across all federal departments.

The proposed promotion amendments, which would also need a change in the law, would permit a major or captain to retain their rank for years, even an entire career, should they possess a sufficiently critical skill-set in a field such as cyberwarfare.

The current system grants senior leaders little flexibility. It lays down requirements, including schooling and command responsibilities, that must be met before promotion, but it also demands they be achieved in a given timeframe.

Under the new proposals, troops would have the right to have their promotion review postponed, if they have yet to meet all the requirements and wish to pursue other opportunities in the meantime, such as higher education or an internship.

In addition to boosting the number of pathways open to current employees, the revamped approach would provide the military with more options when seeking to recruit outside talent. Already, doctors, lawyers and chaplains can be recruited and started at higher ranks, rather than starting them at the bottom of the officer ladder; that would be extended to other critical skills.

Other changes would permit promotion based on merit, instead of seniority, as well as making it easier for those who leave the service on medical grounds to find employment with the defense department as a civilian.

Changes already implemented by Mr. Carter include a doubling of paid maternity leave and the expansion of military child care facilities.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Pentagon proposals seek to retain critical talent. What's up for discussion?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2016/0609/Pentagon-proposals-seek-to-retain-critical-talent.-What-s-up-for-discussion
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe