Women should be allowed in military draft, say top officials

The comments follow a December announcement that women would be eligible for all combat positions in the military.

|
Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
Commandant of the US Marine Corps Gen. Robert Neller (l.) testifies during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the implementation of the decision to open all ground combat units to women on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 2, 2016. Seated from left are Neller, US Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, Under Secretary of the Army Patrick Murphy, and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley.

Two top US military officials said that women should be eligible for the draft.

On Tuesday, Gen. Mark Milley, chief of staff of the Army, and Gen. Robert B. Neller, Marine Corps commandant, testified in front of a Senate Armed Services Committee and expressed opinions that women should be required to register for a military draft. The comments came in response to Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) of Missouri, who asked a question concerning the possible change.

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus and Acting Army Secretary Patrick Murphy were also at the hearing and stated their support for continued discussion on the topic. Gen. Milley’s and Gen. Neller’s comments are the first time top military officials have publicly supported integrating women into the draft.

The US military is currently an all-volunteer force, but men are required to sign up for Selective Service, which registers them in case a draft is needed. Women have historically been ineligible for both the draft and combat positions, but minds are shifting.

"Senator, it’s my personal view that, based on this lifting of restrictions … every American who’s physically qualified should register for the draft,” Gen. Neller said at the hearing, according to The Washington Post

In December, Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced women would be allowed to serve in combat posts across all branches of the military without exception. The move, while increasing the likelihood that the draft eligibility would be opened to include women, also reflected a shifting national opinion on women’s role in the military. 

A 2013 Mason Dixon poll found that 59 percent of Americans said women should be eligible for the draft, including 61 percent of women and 57 percent of men. That's a jump in support from earlier decades. Gallop polls from 1979 to 2001 showed the issue was a controversial one, with the percentage of Americans approving of women being eligible for the draft remained about the same over the 22-year period (43 percent in 1979 and 46 percent in 2001).

Women interviewed by The Christian Science Monitor in December 2015, after Sec. Carter’s announcement, also reflected a range of opinions, with most endorsing the change.

“I would be terrified,” Louise VanDenburgh, an 18-year-old international affairs major at George Washington University, said. Then she declared, “I would rise to the occasion.” 

“It’s not my dream to do it, but I know for some women it is – and if giving women that opportunity means I have to sign up, then I will,” Dorothy White, a PhD student said. 

Carter’s announcement in December and the comments made Tuesday prompted a range of reactions during the Senate committee hearing.

Some senators expressed concerns that quotas would be set to ensure certain amounts of women filled various combat roles.

Military leaders rejected the suggestions and affirmed it would not happen. “It would endanger not only the safety of Marines, but also the safety of our nation,” Sec. Mabus said, according to Reuters.

If women are approved for the draft, registering for Selective Service could also take time. The process of integrating women into combat units has been slow, according to Reuters. Military leaders estimate it will take years before the integration is complete.

“No less than one to three years of deliberate effort,” Gen. Milley estimated at the hearing.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Women should be allowed in military draft, say top officials
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2016/0203/Women-should-be-allowed-in-military-draft-say-top-officials
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe