Top 10 revelations from Leon Panetta's new book 'Worthy Fights'

Leon Panetta's book, “Worthy Fights: a Memoir of Leadership in War and Peace,” comes out Tuesday.

7. Obama team rejected advice to keep troops in Iraq

Pablo Martinez/Reuters/File
The US and Iraqi national flags, and the US Forces in Iraq colors, are seen before they are carried in during ceremonies marking the end of US military mission in Baghdad on Dec. 15, 2011.

Panetta and Secretary Clinton lobbied 'privately and publicly' to keep troops in Iraq, but the Obama White House pushed back.

So, too, did Michele Flournoy, then the No. 3 civilian – and top-ranking woman ever – at the Pentagon. The position “reflected not just my views, but also those of the military commanders in the region,” he writes. “But the president’s team at the White House pushed back, and the differences occasionally became heated.”

Those in favor of keeping US troops in Iraq post-2011 viewed the White House as “eager to rid itself of Iraq.” Negotiations continued with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, but “to my frustration,” Panetta writes, “the White House never really led them.”

While the White House “seemed content to endorse an agreement if State and Defense could reach one, without the president’s active advocacy, Maliki was allowed to slip away. The deal never materialized,” Panetta writes, adding that: “To this day, I believe that a small, focused US troop presence in Iraq could have effectively advised the Iraqi military on how to deal with Al Qaeda’s resurgence.”

As it stands now, the Islamic State offensive now taking place “greatly increases the risk that Iraq will become Al Qaeda’s next safe haven,” he adds. “If we don’t prevent these Sunni extremists from taking over large swaths of territory in the Middle East, it will be only a matter of time before they turn their sights on us.”

7 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.