'Friendly fire' deaths in Afghanistan: Relatively rare, they draw attention.

Five Special Operations Forces soldiers returning from a joint US-Afghan operation called in air support when they encountered insurgents. A B1 responding to the request reportedly hit the wrong target.

|
Rahmat Gul/AP
An Afghan police officer stands guard during a campaign rally in the Paghman district of Kabul, Afghanistan, Monday, June 9. Five American troops were killed in an apparent coalition airstrike in southern Afghanistan, officials said Tuesday, in one of the worst friendly fire incidents involving US and coalition troops since the start of the war in 2001.

Five American Special Operations Forces soldiers on a mission with Afghan troops in southern Afghanistan were killed in what appears to have been one of the worst cases of friendly fire of the 13-year-old Afghanistan war.

The deadly incident took place Monday in Zabul Province when forces involved in a joint US-Afghan operation came under attack from insurgents and called in air support, the Pentagon and NATO officials said Tuesday. The Pentagon said it is investigating “the likelihood that friendly fire was the cause” of six deaths – the five US servicemen and one Afghan soldier – based on reports that the B-1 bomber responding to the air support request attacked the wrong target.

In a statement Tuesday, NATO said the deaths occurred when a unit returning to base after an operation encountered “enemy forces” but that “tragically, there is the possibility that fratricide may have been involved.”

The incident occurred as Taliban insurgents step up their operations as part of an effort to destabilize Saturday’s run-off presidential election. But it also comes in the context of shrinking US involvement in combat operations with Afghan forces as the US-led International Security Assistance Forces prepare to fully withdraw from Afghanistan by the end of the year.

Friendly-fire incidents are responsible for only a small percentage of the more than 3,400 international coalition deaths (of which more than 2,175 have been Americans) in the Afghanistan war, but such deaths have often received added attention.

One of the most notorious incidents occurred in April 2002, when an American F-16 dropped a laser-guided bomb on Canadian troops conducting night exercises, killing four Canadians and injuring eight. The F-16’s pilot, Air National Guard Maj. Harry Schmidt, was found guilty of dereliction of duty.

In another controversial incident in 2004, former NFL player Pat Tillman was killed in what the Pentagon determined was a firefight between two US units that each mistook the other for the enemy.  

Friendly-fire casualties occurred occasionally in subsequent years as Coalition forces engaged in heavy fighting, particularly in the restive south and east of the country.

But in recent years, as NATO forces shifted increasingly to training and assisting the growing Afghan security forces, attention has shifted to so-called “green-on-blue” incidents, as cases of Afghan forces firing on their US and other foreign counterparts increased.

Total international forces in Afghanistan now stand at about 50,000, with just under 33,000 of those being Americans. NATO’s mission in Afghanistan will draw to a close by the end of the year, but President Obama has announced that 9,800 US military personnel will remain next year for training and limited counterterrorism operations.

An uncertain number of other foreign forces are expected to remain for training assistance as well.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Friendly fire' deaths in Afghanistan: Relatively rare, they draw attention.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2014/0610/Friendly-fire-deaths-in-Afghanistan-Relatively-rare-they-draw-attention
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe