US Justice Department loses patience with Ferguson City Council

Members of the Ferguson City Council have said that financial obstacles prevent them from accepting the Department of Justice's suggested reforms whole-cloth.

|
David Carson/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/AP
Ferguson Mayor James Knowles III (c.) talks to the media after the Ferguson, Mo., city council meeting in Ferguson on Tuesday, where the council voted to approve a modified consent decree with the United States Department of Justice. The Department of Justice deemed the modifications unacceptable and on Wednesday began legal proceedings to sue the city.

The US Department of Justice is suing the city of Ferguson, Mo., over the City Council's resistance to absorb the costs associated with federally structured reforms of the city's justice system.

After being surprised by proposed last minute amendments to a reform deal, the Justice Department began legal proceedings on Wednesday to sue the city. An earlier inquiry by the Justice Department found policing polices in the city to be biased against minorities and used to generate revenue.

On Tuesday, the Ferguson City Council had agreed to the DOJ's proposed reforms, but with seven amendments designed to lower the costs of implementation. The amendments were deemed unacceptable by the Justice Department.

"The residents of Ferguson have waited nearly a year for their city to adopt an agreement that would protect their rights and keep them safe," Attorney General Loretta Lynch said at a news conference after the announcement.

Mayor James Knowles said reforms had to be affordable, saying at a news conference, “"It serves no one's purpose for us to fail.”

Ferguson gained national notoriety as a symbol of systemic problems in policing and race relations after an unarmed black man, Michael Brown, was killed by a white police officer in 2014. The St. Louis suburb was one of the main sites of protests and the focal point of the national conversation. 

A subsequent Justice Department report came down hard on the state of Ferguson’s police and court system.

“Ferguson’s law enforcement practices are shaped by the City’s focus on revenue rather than by public safety needs,” the Justice Department reported. “African Americans experience disparate impact in nearly every aspect of Ferguson’s law enforcement system.”

Despite the city’s troubled past, some sympathize with its dire financial situation.

“Money is definitely a part of the equation” for municipalities with poor relations between police and citizens, Bill Johnson, executive director of the National Association of Police Organizations in Alexandria, Va, told The Christian Science Monitor. 

Ferguson has a working budget of $14.5 million and is facing a $2.8 million deficit without the reform costs. Estimates for the reform deal place that first year’s costs at up to $3.7 million and between $1.8 million and $3 million the second and third year.

The biggest proposed amendment to the plan was to remove a clause stating Ferguson had to increase the wages of police officers, which officials believe could result in nearly $1 million annually for Ferguson.

A civil rights lawsuit could be another source of financial burden.

“We made clear that our goal was to reach an agreement to avoid litigation,” Ms. Lynch said at the news conference. “But we also made clear that if there was no agreement, we would be forced to go to court to protect the rights of Ferguson residents.”

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to US Justice Department loses patience with Ferguson City Council
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0211/US-Justice-Department-loses-patience-with-Ferguson-City-Council
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe