US breaks exoneration record for third year in a row: What's driving the trend?

Courts cleared a record number of wrongful conviction cases in 2015, with Texas in the lead, according to a report released Wednesday.

|
Amanda Rossmann/The Cincinnati Enquirer/AP/File
William ‘Ricky’ Virgil, convicted of a 1987 murder, smiles after Campbell County Circuit Court Judge Fred Stine granted him a new trial, on Dec. 18, in Newport, Ky. The Kentucky Innocence Project, which investigates innocence claims and fights for exoneration with new evidence, argued on his behalf. A record 149 wrongful convictions were overturned in the United States in 2015, the National Registry of Exonerations reported Wednesday.

Texas has a reputation for being tough on crime, but the state’s performance in 2015 shows its courts are trying to be tough on justice, too.

US courts cleared a record 149 wrongful convictions in 2015, with 54 of them in Texas, according to a report released on Wednesday by the National Registry of Exonerations at the University of Michigan Law School.

The United States has seen record numbers of exonerations for three years in a row now, driven, in part, by a renewed willingness among prosecutors to revisit old cases. And Texas has been leading that charge, as The Christian Science Monitor reported in 2014. 

Although forensics played a role, the record number of exonerations had little to do with sudden discoveries of hard evidence or DNA searches; rather, courts in Dallas, Houston, and Brooklyn, N.Y., instigated case reviews by establishing conviction integrity units.

“For the integrity of the system, it is the right thing to do," Inger Chandler, head of the Harris County District Attorney's Conviction Review Section, which saw 42 exonerations last year, told Reuters.

Texas led the pack for exonerating wrongful convictions, but New York had 17 exonerations, and Illinois had 13.

“There is a coming to terms that this is a regular problem, not just something that happens once in a while and unpredictably," Samuel Gross, the registry’s editor and a law professor at the University of Michigan told Reuters. "But progress so far is a drop in the bucket."

Official misconduct was a partial driver of the record number of cases in 2015. Three-quarters of the 58 homicide cases were exonerated because of such court missteps.  

Exonerated drug convictions, however, had a different driver. In many convictions for drug possession, the investigative units used lab evidence and found that some people confessed to avoid a trial with the possibility of longer sentences.

“We have turned the corner in dealing with wrongful convictions,” the report said. “There's a lot more to do, but it's just a matter of time.”

The shift toward restorative justice began several years ago. A then-record 87 cases were exonerated in 2013, as prosecutors began to make innocence investigations more of a priority, the Monitor reported.

Texas, New York, and Illinois led the way for exonerations then as well. Only 18 were prompted by DNA evidence, a sign that courts were starting investigations proactively rather than waiting for new evidence to appear.  

“Police and prosecutors appear to be taking increasingly active roles in reinvestigating possible false convictions, and to be more responsive to claims of innocence from convicted defendants,” according to a report at the time.

Courts exonerated 139 cases in 2014, driven increased willingness to revisit cases using the investigative units and cooperation, or even initiation, by law enforcement.

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to US breaks exoneration record for third year in a row: What's driving the trend?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0203/US-breaks-exoneration-record-for-third-year-in-a-row-What-s-driving-the-trend
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe