Robert Durst agrees to seven-year jail term: Are murder charges coming next?

The real estate heir Robert Durst pleaded guilty to illegally possessing a firearm as part of a plea agreement and could soon face a trial for murder.

|
Mike Segar/Reuters/File
Real estate heir Robert Durst appears in a New York criminal courtroom for his trial on charges of trespassing on property owned by his estranged family, on Dec. 10, 2014. Real estate heir and murder suspect Robert Durst plead guilty to a federal gun charge in New Orleans Wednesday.

The multimillionaire and murder suspect Robert Durst struck a tentative plea deal on Wednesday that could clear the way for a murder trial in Los Angeles next year.

Although a murder case against Mr. Durst has been investigated by the police, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and even a 2015 HBO series "The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst," his guilt and fate remain murky.

In this case, the TV series put a spotlight on Durst, and revealed possible evidence that raised new suspicions for law enforcement officials. Is he a serial killer craving attention or an innocent man who hoped that an HBO series might clear his name? 

Durst pleaded guilty to charges of possessing a firearm as a felon. The FBI had found the revolver, along with $42,000 in cash, marijuana, and a latex mask, in his New Orleans hotel room when he was arrested last year. 

The FBI arrested Durst, ironically enough, one day before the controversial HBO series on his life and suspected crimes – including the 2003 death and dismemberment of his Texas neighbor and his wife's disappearance in 1982 – concluded. Durst has been in a Louisiana jail ever since.

The plea agreement reached Wednesday clears the way for another murder trial in Los Angeles, where prosecutors want to try him for the death of his friend, Susan Berman. Durst could face seven years and one month in jail and be extradited to California in August, pending a final ruling by US District Judge Kurt Engelhardt in two weeks.

Durst's defense attorney Richard DeGuerin said he would push to move Durst to California, so he can prove his innocence in court.

"What we're doing and have been trying to do from the start is get Bob Durst to Los Angeles," Mr. DeGuerin said after the hearing, according to the Associated Press. "Bob Durst did not kill Susan Berman, does not know who did, and wants to prove it."

Although Durst agreed to interviews for the HBO documentary about his exploits, they have contributed to the case against him. During the final episode of the series, filmmakers revealed audio captured accidentally during an interview break in which Durst mumbles, "What the hell did I do? Killed them all, of course."

The series also showed two handwriting samples, both featuring a distinctive block lettering and the misspelled word “Beverley." One was an envelope Durst sent the murdered Ms. Berman in 1999; the other was an anonymous note sent to police when she was murdered in 2000.

"Sometimes sociopaths crave the spotlight they get for their crimes and are more than happy to cooperate with journalists, authors, and documentary filmmakers,” Paul Levinson, media critic and professor of communications and media studies at Fordham University in New York, told The Christian Science Monitor. “But there is a price that they may sometimes have to pay for the publicity: The investigative reporter or filmmaker may uncover new damaging facts, or the spotlight on the crimes may well embolden and invigorate police and prosecutors.”

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Robert Durst agrees to seven-year jail term: Are murder charges coming next?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0203/Robert-Durst-agrees-to-seven-year-jail-term-Are-murder-charges-coming-next
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe