Public confidence in Supreme Court at historic low, poll suggests

Only 30 percent of Americans have a 'great deal' or 'quite a lot' of confidence in the Supreme Court, according to Gallup. But another poll offers a more nuanced view.

|
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
The Supreme Court building in Washington, Monday, June 30, 2014.

It’s no secret that the American public distrusts Congress, but this distrust is seeping into the public’s view of the government’s other branches, according to a recent poll by Gallup.

Only 30 percent of Americans have a “great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in the Supreme Court. That’s the lowest figure since Gallup began measuring in 1973.

Recently, the report notes, confidence in the presidency and in the Supreme Court have been closely tied to each other. The presidential confidence rating, which stands at 29 percent according to Gallup, is at a six-year low.

Confidence in the court reached its high of 56 percent twice, in 1985 and 1988. It remained in the 40s and 50s for all but one year until 2007, when the Supreme Court’s confidence rating began its decline into the low 30s.

Though less than a third of Americans have a “great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in the high court, according to Gallup, the portion of Americans who hold “very” or “mostly favorable” opinions of the court has risen, according to the Pew Research Center.

Though this distinction might seem fine, it is significant. The Pew survey conducted this April showed bipartisan favorability for the Supreme Court, with 63 percent of Democrats and 54 percent of Republicans expressing a “very” or “mostly favorable” view of the court. Overall, the number was 56 percent. That figure represents a bump up from July 2013, when 48 percent of respondents viewed the court favorably, after the court’s relatively unpopular rulings on the Voting Rights Act and same-sex marriage.

Still, neither poll is necessarily a reason to celebrate. The Supreme Court’s favorability rating, which historically hovered around 70 percent during the past two decades, is at its second-lowest point since Pew began measuring in 1985 – beating out only 2013.

Typically, favorability ratings for the court have hinged on its most recent actions. Shortly after it upheld key aspects of the Affordable Care Act in 2012, 64 percent of Democrats approved of the court versus 38 percent of Republicans. This partisan divide was also present shortly after the nomination of the left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan in 2010.

That means that the court’s high approval rating among Democrats – and among the public more generally – could fall after the its decision on Tuesday to allow companies to deny their employees contraceptive coverage in some situations.

“There was a dramatic partisan reaction to the ACA decision in 2012, so its reasonable to think this will also have a partisan reaction,” says Alec Tyson, senior research analyst at Pew. “What we can also say about the ACA decision is that the drop in favorability among Republicans was greater than the rise among Democrats.”

The recent Gallup poll was conducted between June 5 and 8 among 1,027 adults, It has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percent.

The Pew survey took place between April 23 and 27 among 1,501, and has a 3 percent margin of error.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Public confidence in Supreme Court at historic low, poll suggests
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2014/0630/Public-confidence-in-Supreme-Court-at-historic-low-poll-suggests
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe