Judge: Bradley Manning 'had reason to believe' his acts could injure the US (+vldeo)

In her final report before sentencing US Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, the court-martial judge said his conduct was 'of a heedless nature that made it actually and imminently dangerous to others.'

|
Patrick Semansky/AP
Army Pfc. Bradley Manning is escorted to a security vehicle outside a courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., Friday, Aug. 16, 2013, after a hearing in his court-martial. Final sentencing arguments will be heard Monday.

The scene has been set for the sentencing of Pfc. Bradley Manning, the young US Army intelligence analyst convicted on multiple espionage violations in the largest leak of classified information in American history.

Final sentencing arguments will be heard next Monday, Col. Denise Lind, the judge in the case, announced Friday, to be followed by her decision on Manning’s punishment a day or two later. Manning faces up to 90 years in prison.

In 10 pages of “special findings” released Friday at the request of Manning’s defense team, Lind explained the rationale for convicting him for offenses that included spying, releasing classified information, disobeying orders, and leaking intelligence knowing that it would be accessible to the enemy.

During the trial, the judge acquitted Manning of “aiding the enemy” charges, which would have required evidence that he knowingly intended to do so. But the judge also noted how close Manning came to doing just that.

“At the time of the charged offense, al Qaeda and al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula were enemies of the United States,” she wrote in the special findings. “Pfc. Manning knew that al Qaeda was an enemy of the United States.”

As evidence, prosecutors had pointed out that references to Manning’s leak of more than 700,000 pieces of classified information to the controversial website WikiLeaks – including diplomatic cables, Guantánamo detainee profiles, and battlefield reports from Iraq and Afghanistan – were found in Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan when US Navy SEALs killed him there in May 2011.

Manning “had reason to believe the information could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation,” she wrote. His conduct was “of a heedless nature that made it actually and imminently dangerous to others.”

Lind found that Manning “knowingly converted the records and information therein, by sending them to WikiLeaks.”

“These knowing conversions involved a misuse of the records, and information therein, that seriously and substantially interfered with the United States government’s property rights,” she wrote. “The records, and information therein, are classified. The knowing conversions by PFC Manning deprived the United States government of the ability to protect its classified information ....”

Lead defense attorney David Coombs spoke to Manning's supporters outside the courtroom Friday. He is said to have told them that Manning "was in good spirits today,” according to the Courthouse News website. Manning's attorney indicated that he expects the soldier to serve his sentence in Fort Leavenworth, Kan., where he has been since April 2011. 

The trial, including Friday’s proceedings, has been held at Fort Meade, Md.

On Wednesday, Manning apologized for what he had done during the time he served in Iraq in 2009 and 2010.

"I'm sorry that my actions hurt people,” he told the court. “I'm sorry that it hurt the United States.”

"I should have worked more aggressively within the system,” Manning said. “Unfortunately, I can't go back and change things. I understand I must pay a price for my decisions.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Judge: Bradley Manning 'had reason to believe' his acts could injure the US (+vldeo)
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2013/0816/Judge-Bradley-Manning-had-reason-to-believe-his-acts-could-injure-the-US-vldeo
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe