Trump and Zelenskyy clash, clouding the path to peace in Ukraine

|
Brian Snyder/Reuters
President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as Vice President JD Vance reacts at the White House in Washington, Feb. 28, 2025.

A White House meeting between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that was meant to set terms for bilateral cooperation collapsed Friday into anger and recriminations in full view of the world.

The stunning clash left a deep sense of foreboding for the embattled Ukraine’s future, and hinted loudly at the U.S. shift away from an alliance-based foreign policy toward one of big-power politics.

What the White House had billed as a meeting to sign a bilateral deal on development of Ukraine’s rare-earth minerals instead unraveled – in real time, with media cameras rolling – into a clash between Mr. Zelenskyy and the president and vice president of the United States.

Why We Wrote This

It was a clash of worldviews, not just of individuals. A falling-out between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy reflects the U.S. pivot toward the view that big powers, not global norms, drive events.

Mr. Trump lauded the Ukrainian people as “very brave” in the face of war but told the Ukrainian leader that his resistance to reaching peace quickly with Russian President Vladimir Putin risked setting off “World War III.”

As Mr. Zelenskyy pushed back that accepting peace on Russia’s terms now would reward the aggressor and only put off war to recommence in the future, Vice President JD Vance chastised the Ukrainian leader for lacking gratitude toward the United States and disrespecting President Trump.

At one point a camera captured Ukrainian Ambassador Oksana Markarova with head in hands – an apt symbol of the diplomatic disaster unfolding before the White House audience.

After the aborted meeting – Mr. Zelenskyy was abruptly asked to leave the premises, according to some White House officials – Mr. Trump took to his Truth Social website to unceremoniously blast the Ukrainian leader.

“He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office,” he wrote. “He can come back when he is ready for peace.”

As extraordinary as the meeting was, it did offer hints of how U.S. foreign policy may be shifting in a world where big-power politics and competition replace a post-World-War-II approach based on alliances and American leadership.

That shift is hitting Ukraine like a whiplash, coming only months after the embattled country was being supported by the U.S. as the epicenter of a geopolitical struggle for the principles of national sovereignty and territorial integrity.

“Putin is going to relish this as a big win, no doubt about that,” says Lawrence Korb, a former assistant secretary of defense who served in the Reagan administration. “This is very worrisome for prospects for continued U.S. aid” to Ukraine, he adds, “and that can only make the Russians happy.”

Beyond one fiery White House meeting, the spectacle of the U.S. publicly lashing a determined but war-weakened ally for resisting capitulation to the regional aggressor underscores how American global leadership has abruptly changed under President Trump, Mr. Korb says.

“Can you imagine if we had told the South Koreans in their dark hour that ‘You have no standing here, we’ll settle this with China and Russia without you at the table,’” he says. “Would South Korea be our valuable ally today?”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Trump and Zelenskyy clash, clouding the path to peace in Ukraine
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2025/0228/trump-zelenskyy-ukraine-peace-meeting
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe