Race to replace John Kerry: Who's real champion of the 'little guy'?

In the first televised debate between the Massachusetts Democrats seeking to replace John Kerry in the Senate, Stephen Lynch accused front-runner Ed Markey of 'siding with the big guys.'

|
Steven Senne/AP
Democratic hopeful for the US Senate Mass. US Reps. Stephen Lynch, left, and Edward Markey, center, prepare for a televised debate as moderator R.D. Sahl, right, looks on at the WCVB-TV studios in Needham, Mass., Wednesday, March 27, 2013.

In their first televised debate before a special US Senate election, Rep. Stephen Lynch sought to make up some ground against front-runner Rep. Ed Markey, framing the race as a debate over which of them really stands up for ordinary citizens.

The two Democrats, in their bids for the seat recently vacated by John Kerry (D), sparred over issues ranging from health care and abortion to the economic plight of Bay State fishermen.

Representative Lynch challenged his rival to explain a vote to bail out the banking industry in 2008, and his ties to big telecommunications firms.

“There seems to be a pattern,” Lynch said in the Wednesday match-up. “You’re siding with the big guys against the little guys…. What’s up with that?”

Representative Markey, the longest-serving member of the state’s congressional delegation, parried the attacks by saying he has used his career in the House to break up telecom monopolies, and that the banking bailout was needed to rescue the whole economy from the risk of a severe depression.

“We could not allow the banking system to collapse onto the hopes and dreams of every family in America,” Markey said.

Lynch is pitching himself as the centrist in the race, at a time when Congress needs to break a pattern of partisan gridlock. Contrasting himself with both the “hard left” and “hard right,” he said “I don't work for Nancy Pelosi,” and  that if elected to the Senate he won’t work for majority leader Harry Reid.

In a state with a strongly Democratic electorate, Markey’s stronger liberal credentials may be one reason he’s been polling ahead of Lynch. He said the vote for Obamacare, the Affordable Care Act, was the “the proudest vote of my career,” and that he’s supported abortion rights for three decades.

Lynch identifies himself as pro-life, while also saying he’s against overturning the Supreme Court’s Roe vs. Wade decision. He praised the group Planned Parenthood (which has endorsed Markey) because reducing unwanted pregnancies is “the real goal” in the quest to bring down abortion rates.

Lynch was one of the rare House Democrats who voted against the Affordable Care Act. He explained his vote by saying the measure raised taxes for businesses and lacked a “public option” health plan to spur competition in the insurance industry.

On the Republican side, a handful of less-known Massachusetts politicians are competing for the nomination: former US attorney Michael Sullivan, state Rep. Daniel Winslow, and Gabriel Gomez, a private equity investor and former Navy SEAL.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Race to replace John Kerry: Who's real champion of the 'little guy'?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Senate/2013/0328/Race-to-replace-John-Kerry-Who-s-real-champion-of-the-little-guy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe