Mitt Romney's five sons: What's their role in the campaign?

There’s no “Mitt Mobile” or Five Brothers blog like there was in 2008, but Mitt Romney’s five sons – Tagg, Matt, Josh, Ben, and Craig – still play a vital role in the presidential campaign. Here's a quick look at the Romney Five and what each brings to the campaign.

5. Tagg Romney

Charles Dharapak/AP/File
Mitt Romney (l.) watches his grandson play soccer in Belmont, Mass., in September with his wife, Ann, and oldest son, Tagg.

The oldest Romney son is the most involved brother in Mitt Romney’s campaign for president.

He was a senior adviser in Mitt’s 2008 Republican primary bid, often acting as a surrogate or spokesman. Tagg’s focus for this campaign was supposed to be fundraising, but he reportedly has taken on a more “aggressive” role in campaign strategy in the past few weeks, a Romney family friend told Politico. He blogs and tweets a mix of campaign updates and family news. ("While Dad preps for debate, the fam ate Sunday dinner. Caught Mom doing dishes w my pa-in-law.)

Tagg and his mother, Ann, were the only two family members who wanted Mitt Romney to run again for president.

“We felt he owed it to the country to give it another chance. And my dad included, he was not at all convinced that he was going to run again,” Tagg said in an interview with Frontline PBS for “The Choice 2012” documentary. “It took a lot of convincing on the part of my mom and some of his senior staff to say, 'This is important for the country that you do this.’ “

Tagg is the managing partner and co-founder of Solamere Capital, a private equity firm in Boston launched along with Spencer Zwick, Romney's chief fundraiser. He lives in Belmont, Mass., with his wife, Jen, and their six kids. The family welcomed twin sons in May via a surrogate mother. In 2006, he was the chief marketing officer for the Los Angeles Dodgers. He received his MBA from Harvard Business School in 1998 and majored in economics at Brigham Young University.

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.