Mitt Romney: top 5 attacks on President Obama

Mitt Romney has yet to nail down the Republican presidential nomination, but he’s already attacking President Obama. Here's a look at five of Mr. Romney’s charges – and whether they’re true.

5. Obama is failing in Afghanistan and Iran

Richard Drew/AP
Mitt Romney is interviewed by Megyn Kelly during a segment of "America Live" on the Fox News Channel in New York Wednesday.

Recent Quran burnings and a massacre of Afghan civilians allegedly by an American soldier have exacerbated tensions between the US and Afghan leaders. In a Fox News interview on March 18, Romney blamed Obama for “failed leadership” in Afghanistan.

Romney was asked what he would do differently, given Obama’s pledge to stay the course toward a planned US withdrawal at the end of 2014.

“Well, first of all, I would exercise leadership,” Romney said, arguing that Obama needs to communicate more with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

“Look, what's happening right now is an example of failed leadership,” said Romney. “The president put out a specific timetable for withdrawal for our troops, a timetable for the end of combat operations. That is leading Mr. Karzai to take action that is self-preservation in nature. The president needs to be more engaged and interacting with not only our commanders there but also with leadership in Afghanistan.”

But when asked if he would change the withdrawal plan, Romney declined to be specific.

“Before I take a stand at a particular course of action, I want to get the input from the people who are there,” Romney said.

On Iran and the threat it could develop nuclear weapons, Romney said Obama waited too long to put in place “crippling sanctions.”

“He should be less worried about Israel taking military action to stop Iran from having a nuclear weapon and more worried about Iran actually having [a] nuclear weapon and ... fissile material,” Romney said. “And he should make it very clear that the United States of America will not allow Iran to have nuclear weapons, and that we will take action, including military action if necessary, to prevent that from occurring.”

In his March 6 press conference, Obama criticized Republican candidates for what he described as their casual talk about war.

“When I see the casualness with which those folks talk about war, I am reminded of the costs involved in war,” he said. “Those who are suggesting or proposing or beating the drums of war should explain clearly to the American people what they think the costs and benefits would be.”

Romney rejected Obama’s criticism.

“Well, it's quite clear that the president wants to avoid in any way a discussion about a military option,” Romney said. “But, of course, we have to recognize that if all else fails – and he's failed on so many dimensions, it's possible that all else will fail. But I hope not.”

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.