Super Tuesday 101: Who’s ahead where

Ten states are holding presidential primaries or caucuses Tuesday – and many Republicans are hoping the results begin to bring an unusually volatile primary season to a close.

Here’s what to look for Tuesday night, state by state:

2. Ohio, 66 delegates

AP Photo/Sentinel-Tribune, J.D. Pooley
Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum speaks in Perrysburg, Ohio, in late February 2012.

While it has 10 fewer delegates than Georgia, this is the true big prize of the night. Not only for its large number of delegates, but also because Ohio is such an important swing state in the general election, and any nominee needs to demonstrate strength here.

Romney has struggled to connect with blue-collar Midwestern conservatives, and in recent weeks he’s been trailing Santorum badly here. His win in neighboring Michigan, though, seems to have helped him.

At this point, Ohio is a tossup, with polls showing Romney and Santorum neck and neck. Romney has the momentum, but Santorum could still conceivably win the state.

In terms of delegates, that doesn’t matter much – Ohio’s delegates are awarded proportionally and Romney and Santorum could emerge with relatively similar numbers of delegates.

But symbolically, a win would be huge for either candidate. For Romney, it would be a second chance – after Michigan – to prove that he can, in fact, win in a key rust belt state. For Santorum, demonstrating that he can win in such a big state – particularly a non-caucus one – would be strong justification for staying in the race and continuing to fight.

This is the state to watch Tuesday night.

2 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.