Massachusetts sues ITT Tech, alleging predatory practices

According to the lawsuit, the vocational school engaged in high-pressure admissions tactics and misled students about graduate employment rates.

|
Elise Amendola/AP/File
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey filed a lawsuit March 31 against ITT Technical Institute on the grounds of engaging in predatory admissions practices.

A popular vocational college in Massachusetts is facing legal scrutiny and charges that the for-profit school misled students about the quality of its programs.

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey filed a lawsuit against ITT Technical Institute, a for-profit school with locations in Norwood and Wilmington, for overstating the success of its programs and presenting false information to prospective students. According to the lawsuit filed on Thursday, the school offered potential students statistics claiming that 80-100 percent of graduates obtained jobs in their related field of study, though the actual rate of placement was only 50 percent or less between 2010 and May 2013.

The admission representatives failed to disclose that its placement rates included graduates with internships or short-term, unsustainable jobs that never became permanent, as well as graduates who received jobs that were outside their field of study. The placement rates also counted alumni selling computers at retail stores and those working in customer service for an airline as having careers in their field of study.

For-profit colleges have faced considerable national scrutiny in recent years, as lawmakers have questioned their recruitment tactics, graduation rates, and numbers of low-income students saddled with high-interest loans. Ms. Healey pledged to address the "emerging scourge of predatory for-profit schools" during her campaign for attorney general in 2014.

Healey's investigation into ITT Tech found that the school used aggressive sales tactics to enroll students in the school including, direct phone calls and in-person communications. Admissions representatives were expected to call up to 100 prospective students per day and would be publicly shamed or fired if they failed to meet their quotas. The representatives persuaded students to make immediate applications, and pressured others into enrolling, regardless of whether they were likely to succeed in the program, according to the lawsuit.

Furthermore, the school promoted false advertisements claiming they provided hands-on training and personalized attention through its program, investigators found. Students complained that teachers were absent at times, and that the school used outdated technology.

"These students were exploited and pressured to enroll with the promise of great careers and high salaries, but were instead left unable to repay their loans and support their families," Healey said in a press release. "Our office has a history of going after predatory for-profit schools and will not stand for students in Massachusetts being treated simply as a source of income. We will continue to investigate and act against these deceptive practices and work hard to get the relief these students deserve."

The lawsuit isn't the first charge against the school, and further adds to schools troubles, as it's still under investigation over allegations that it may have defrauded the federal government.

The complaint also alleges that federal loans accounted for most of the students' debt, and that the school steered students to expensive, private loans when they weren't able to repay. The complaint seeks civil penalties of $5,000 for "injunctive relief and restitution, including the return of tuition and fees to eligible students" that were targeted by ITT.

ITT released a statement expressing its disappointment in the lawsuit, calling it a "wide-ranging fishing expedition."

"The attorney general's action is all the more disappointing because it extends Massachusetts' woeful record of hostility toward career colleges that train non-traditional and underserved students," read a statement from the school, according to Boston Business Journal. "At a time when Massachusetts is experiencing a severe shortage of technically-trained professionals, this action will have a negative effect on the education and employment climate in Massachusetts."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Massachusetts sues ITT Tech, alleging predatory practices
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2016/0405/Massachusetts-sues-ITT-Tech-alleging-predatory-practices
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe