College sexual assaults: US campuses' failures seen as 'call to action'

Many US colleges are failing to follow some of the most basic practices for responding to and preventing sexual assaults, concludes a first-of-its kind national survey released by Sen. Claire McCaskill.

Despite stepped up attention in recent years to sexual assaults on college campuses, many colleges are failing to follow some of the most basic practices for responding to and preventing such attacks. That’s the conclusion of a first-of-its kind national survey released Wednesday by Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) of Missouri.

“If we’re going to turn the tide against sexual violence, survivors must be protected, empowered, and given the confidence that if they make the difficult choice to report a crime, they will be treated with respect and taken seriously,” Senator McCaskill, a former sex-crimes prosecutor, said in a statement. “These results should serve as a call to action to our colleges and universities to tackle this terrible crime.”

Among the findings of the survey of 440 campuses, representing more than 5 million students:

• Forty-one percent have not conducted a single sexual-offense investigation in the past five years. Among schools that reported more than zero sexual offenses to the Department of Education, however, only nine percent had conducted fewer investigations than the number of crimes reported.

• Many campuses fail to encourage the reporting of sexual assaults. Forty-nine percent do not provide a 24-hour reporting hotline and 66 percent do not provide an online reporting option.

• Twenty percent provide no sexual-assault awareness training for faculty and staff; 31 percent provide no training for students.

• Many campuses do not follow recommended practices for adjudicating complaints of sexual assault. Just over one-quarter have students participating on disciplinary boards, which experts say can create privacy concerns and conflicts of interest. More than 20 percent give the athletic department oversight in cases involving athletes.

• Fifteen percent of campuses require a higher burden of proof against the accused than “preponderance of the evidence,” the standard that the US Department of Education says is necessary for Title IX civil-rights protections.

• Although they are required to designate a Title IX coordinator to oversee compliance, 11 percent of institutions have failed to do so.

The Department of Education has been working to enforce Title IX vigorously and recently published a list of schools under investigation for complaints about how they handle sexual assaults.

It also put forward rules for public comment recently to implement changes to the Clery Act, a law overseeing the reporting and prevention of crimes on college campuses.

Rape and sexual harassment on campuses have also been the subject of student activism, which has led to updates in policies at prestigious institutions such as Dartmouth, Harvard, and Yale.

“Many colleges are doing good work in this field, and we need to recognize that. But there are also colleges that need help in responding to sexual assaults on their campuses,” said Sen. Tom Harkin (D) of Iowa at a hearing last month held by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which he chairs. “No student should have to endure the trauma of a sexual assault or face the risk of being sexually assaulted while in college.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to College sexual assaults: US campuses' failures seen as 'call to action'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2014/0710/College-sexual-assaults-US-campuses-failures-seen-as-call-to-action
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe