'The Donald' suggests Obama was in on lawsuit against Trump University

Donald Trump on Monday implied that President Obama may have helped plan a lawsuit filed by New York's attorney general. According to the suit, Mr. Trump's for-profit enterprise defrauded consumers.

|
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP/File
Donald Trump speaks at the 40th annual Conservative Political Action Conference in National Harbor, Md., March 15, 2013. Trump on Monday implied that President Obama may have helped plan a lawsuit filed by New York's attorney general, to smear the outspoken critic of the president.

Saying it could be a “mini IRS” scandal, Donald Trump blasted President Obama and New York’s attorney general Monday morning, suggesting the two may have planned a lawsuit to smear the outspoken critic of the president.

Mr. Trump was responding to the lawsuit filed Saturday by Eric Schneiderman, a Democrat, in which the attorney general charged the real estate mogul with running a bait-and-switch scam with his former “Trump University.” The suit seeks $40 million in restitution for the alleged defrauding of consumers.

According to the suit, the celebrity billionaire ran the unlicensed educational institution from 2005 to 2011, promising to teach enrollees his “very own real estate strategies and techniques” with instructors “handpicked” by Trump himself – claims the suit says are false. Trump University changed its name to the Trump Entrepreneur Initiative in 2010 after the New York State Education Department told him use of the word “university” was misleading and illegal.

"More than 5,000 people across the country who paid Donald Trump $40 million to teach them his hard sell tactics got a hard lesson in bait-and-switch," Mr. Schneiderman said in a statement Saturday. "Mr. Trump used his celebrity status and personally appeared in commercials making false promises to convince people to spend tens of thousands of dollars they couldn't afford for lessons they never got.”

Calling in on “Fox & Friends” Monday, Trump responded by calling Schneiderman a “political hack,” seeking publicity with the lawsuit. And over the weekend, one of his lawyers said the suit was “tantamount to extortion,” since Trump had previously contributed $12,500 to the attorney general’s first-term campaign in 2010.

Trump said Schneiderman came to his office often, seeking contributions and the names of his “big-business friends.” The attorney general, he also said, was unhappy with the amount he had contributed.  

“I’m not a very paranoid person, but when this lightweight attorney general, who is not respected by anybody, when he meets with the president and then files a suit, you know, 24 hours later, I think, yes, I think I’ve been targeted, and I think it’s a big problem, and I think people ought to look into it,” Trump said to “Fox & Friends.”

“I’ve never heard of such a thing,” he continued. “Now he meets with the president on Thursday night, he sues me on Saturday. It was a terribly drawn suit, incompetently drawn suit, and they obviously did it very quickly. But probably Obama – maybe this is a mini IRS, maybe we have to get the tea party after these people, because this could very well be a mini IRS,” he said, referring to the controversy over the Internal Revenue Service singling out certain political groups.

The attorney general denied talking about Trump with the president.

Schneiderman began an investigation into the school in May 2011, after a string of consumer complaints and the reprimand from the state’s Education Department. In advertisements, Trump promised his that “handpicked instructors” would share his techniques and that students could “just copy exactly what I’ve done and get rich.”

Students responding to these advertisements began with a free 90-minute seminar, which simply urged the purchase of a $1,495 three-day seminar. Instructors then urged students to purchase the “Trump Elite” package, billed as a personal mentorship program costing $35,000 a course – a classic “upsell” in a bait-and-switch scheme, the suit alleges.

“There is a kind of groupthink that goes on in such seminars, in which each speaker is idolized and thought to be a 'messiah' of sorts who is able to bestow the keys to the castle, if only you buy his outrageously expensive package of materials,” says Dr. Carole Lieberman, a Los Angeles-based author and media expert familiar with Trump’s seminars. “The problem is that in this highly charged atmosphere – where the pot of gold seems to be at your fingertips – the temptation to believe is overwhelming, especially in these desperate economic times.”

According to Schneiderman’s suit, students in the three-day seminars did not receive any substantive instruction or extensive “apprenticeship support,” as ads promised, but merely a list of lenders from a commercially available magazine. And instead of meeting Trump, as some Elite enrollees were led to expect, students were simply given the chance to take a picture with a life-size photo of “The Donald.”

The New York attorney general’s office has been conducting a number of probes into the for-profit education industry over the past few years, and Schneiderman has investigated how recruiters at such schools may misrepresent their accreditation and their ability to find graduates jobs, as well as the costs of instruction.

Last week, Schneiderman announced a $10 million settlement with Career Education Corp., a global company that offers “career-focused learning” and “career opportunities” in online and traditional classrooms. The company, which offers degrees from associate’s to PhDs, had misrepresented its accreditations and significantly inflated its graduates’ job placement rates.

Trump said he was shocked his for-profit educational company was included in this investigation.

“You can turn on television at 2 in the morning, you’ll see everybody and his neighbor advertising to buy this school and buy this book and go into these courses,” he told “Fox & Friends.” “I’ve done really well in real estate: I’ve really imparted a lot of my knowledge to other people, and I really think that we have a great school. They’ve done a fantastic job. When you get 98 percent approval ratings from the people who took the courses, and then you get sued, is rather shocking."

"You have hundreds of schools operating in New York, and they don’t get sued?" he continued. "But Trump gets sued. You tell me, the day after he meets with the president and I get sued?”

Trump has since closed his former university.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'The Donald' suggests Obama was in on lawsuit against Trump University
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2013/0826/The-Donald-suggests-Obama-was-in-on-lawsuit-against-Trump-University
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe