Judge blocks Trump’s order halting the U.S. refugee admissions system

The lawsuit, brought by a group of religious organizations and refugees, came in response to President Donald Trump’s order suspending the refugee program. The president’s authority “is not limitless,” a federal judge said in his ruling.

|
Ryan Sun/AP
People gather outside the U.S. District Court after a federal judge blocked President Donald Trump's effort to halt the nation's refugee admissions system on Feb. 25, 2025, in Seattle.

A federal judge in Seattle blocked President Donald Trump’s effort to halt the nation’s refugee admissions system Feb. 25.

The ruling came in a lawsuit brought by major refugee aid groups, who argued that Mr. Trump’s executive order suspending the federal refugee resettlement program ran afoul of the system Congress created for moving refugees into the United States.

Lawyers for the administration argued that Mr. Trump’s order was well within his authority to deny entry to foreigners whose admission to the U.S. “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

U.S. District Judge Jamal Whitehead said in his ruling after the hearing Feb. 25 that the president’s actions amounted to an “effective nullification of congressional will” in setting up the nation’s refugee admissions program.

“The president has substantial discretion ... to suspend refugee admissions,” Mr. Whitehead told the parties. “But that authority is not limitless.”

Justice Department lawyer August Flentje indicated to the judge that the government would consider whether to file an emergency appeal.

The plaintiffs include the International Refugee Assistance Project on behalf of Church World Service, the Jewish refugee resettlement agency HIAS, Lutheran Community Services Northwest, and individual refugees and family members. They said their ability to provide critical services to refugees – including those already in the U.S. – has been severely inhibited by Mr. Trump’s order.

Some refugees who had been approved to come to the U.S. had their travel canceled on short notice, and families who have waited years to reunite have had to remain apart, the lawsuit said.

Mr. Trump’s recent order said the refugee program – a form of legal migration to the U.S. – would be suspended because cities and communities had been taxed by “record levels of migration” and didn’t have the ability to “absorb large numbers of migrants, and in particular, refugees.”

The federal refugee program has been in place for decades and helps people who have escaped war, natural disaster, or persecution. Despite long-standing support from both parties for accepting thoroughly vetted refugees, the program has become politicized in recent years.

Mr. Trump also temporarily halted it during his first term, and then dramatically lowered the number of refugees who could enter the U.S. each year.

Last week a federal judge in Washington, D.C., refused to immediately block the Mr. Trump administration’s actions in a similar lawsuit brought by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. That case faces another hearing Feb. 28.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Judge blocks Trump’s order halting the U.S. refugee admissions system
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2025/0225/trump-lawsuit-executive-order-refugee-resettlement
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe