Skip to footer

Judge: Texas law punishing 'sanctuary cities' is likely unconstitutional

Judge Orlando Garcia has blocked portions of a Texas bill, which was meant to punish so-called "sanctuary cities," just two days before it was due to become law.

|
Ricardo B. Brazziell/Austin American-Statesman via AP
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott speaks during a press briefing in Austin, Texas on August 30, 2017. A federal judge late Wednesday temporarily blocked most of Texas’ tough new “sanctuary cities” law that would have let police officers ask people during routine stops whether they’re in the US legally and threatened sheriffs with jail time for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities. Abbott, who signed the law in May, said Texas would appeal immediately and expressed confidence that the state would eventually prevail.
  • By Jon Herskovitz Reuters

| AUSTIN, Texas

A United States judge on Wednesday blocked sections of a Texas law intended to punish so-called "sanctuary cities," regarded as soft on immigration, in a ruling handed down two days before the law was due to come into effect.

Chief US District Judge Orlando Garcia in San Antonio's federal court found the Texas legislation was unlikely to withstand constitutional scrutiny.

The judge's ruling temporarily blocks part of the law that would require local law enforcement agencies in Texas to fulfill requests by US immigration agents to hold immigrants in their jails until they can be picked up for deportation.

It also strikes down a provision that would have prevented local officials from adopting policies that might limit immigration enforcement in the state.

"The court cannot and does not second-guess the legislature, Mr. Garcia wrote in a 94-page decision. "However, the state may not exercise its authority in a manner that violates the United States Constitution."

The decision in Texas could have ramifications nationwide as other Republican-controlled states are looking at legislation targeting sanctuary cities, which they say illegally shield immigrants.

The Texas law, which takes aim at any jurisdiction that refuses to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, is considered one of the toughest anti-illegal immigration efforts in the country.

The ruling will make Texas communities less safe, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) said in a statement.

"This decision will be appealed immediately and I am confident Texas' law will be found constitutional and ultimately be upheld," Governor Abbott added.

It was the first law of its kind passed since President Donald Trump took office in January, pledging to crack down on illegal immigration.

The American Civil Liberties Union challenged the Texas measure in a lawsuit on behalf of some local jurisdictions in the state.

"The court was right to strike down virtually all of this patently unconstitutional law," Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU's immigrant rights project, said in a statement.

The impending law added to the anxiety felt by some illegal immigrants forced to evacuate their flooded homes in Houston after Hurricane Harvey struck southeast Texas.

Nevertheless, federal agents are not enforcing immigration law at evacuation sites, shelters or food banks where people affected by flooding are seeking aid, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement said in a statement on Wednesday.

Some police chiefs have said forcing local police to work with US immigration agents undermines community trust, making immigrants less likely to report crimes.

"This week's crisis with Hurricane Harvey is just the most recent example why people need to feel safe approaching our local police and support groups, no matter what," Steve Adler, mayor of Texas' state capital Austin, said in a statement.

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Judge: Texas law punishing 'sanctuary cities' is likely unconstitutional
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2017/0831/Judge-Texas-law-punishing-sanctuary-cities-is-likely-unconstitutional
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe