LA City Council bans high-capacity ammunition magazines: Can they do that?

The council unanimously voted on Tuesday to outlaw the possession of gun magazines that can hold 10 or more rounds of ammunition. Gun rights groups say the move violates the Second Amendment.

|
Kevork Djansezian/Reuters/File
Los Angeles Police Department detective Ken Yueng inspects an assault rifle during a gun buyback program organized by Mayor Eric Garcetti's Gang Reduction and Youth Development Office in Los Angeles, Calif., December 14, 2013. The Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously to ban the possession of large-capacity gun magazines on Tuesday following San Francisco to become the second major city in California to take that step. The ordinance prohibits Los Angeles residents from possessing a handgun or rifle magazine that fits more than 10 rounds.

Despite strong opposition from guns rights groups, the Los Angeles City Council has voted to ban the possession of high-capacity firearm magazines. 

The new law, which was passed 12-0 Tuesday, makes it illegal to possess gun magazines that hold 10 or more rounds. Those who currently have the magazines will have 60 days from the time the law takes effect to sell, destroy, or take the clips out of the city.

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti (D) said he was eager to sign the measure, as it has the potential to save lives. 

Several guns rights groups have threatened to sue, saying that the new law violates the 2nd Amendment and is preempted by existing state law. 

High-capacity magazines have been the common thread in many mass shootings across the country over the years, including Newtown, Virginia Tech, and Columbine, said Juliet Leftwich, legal director for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, to the Los Angeles Times. Councilman Paul Krekorian, who led a 2-year push for the ban, referenced some of these shootings during a rally at Los Angeles City Hall before the vote.

High-capacity magazines “are in common use for self defense and they are overwhelmingly chosen for that purpose,” said Anna M. Barvir, an attorney whose firm represents the NRA and other guns rights groups, in a statement.  “Indeed, millions are in the hands of good American citizens. As such, they are fully protected by the Constitution.” 

Mr. Krekorian responded by saying, “If the NRA wants to sue us over this, bring it on,” at a celebratory rally following the vote, according to a Los Angeles Times report. 

“People who want to defend their families don’t need a 100-round drum magazine and an automatic weapon to do it,” Krekorian said. 

Others have raised concerns about how effective the new law will be, since these magazines are still legal in nearby cities such as Glendale and Burbank. 

“Bad people are going to do bad things, and they’ll do it regardless of whatever laws are in place,” said Chad Cheung, director of the CalGuns Shooting Sports Association, at the hearing on Tuesday.

The new rules are modeled on already-existing ordinances in San Francisco and Sunnyvale, Calif., both of which have withstood legal challenges thus far. New York State also passed a similar law in 2013 following the mass shooting in Newtown, Conn., at Sandy Hook Elementary School. 

Mike McLively, a staff lawyer with the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, told The New York Times he hopes the Los Angeles law will have a ripple effect.

“This is the very kind of ammunition that allows more fatalities in a shorter time,” Mr. McLively said. “Local governments are saying we need to do everything we can to reduce mass shootings that we’re seeing with more and more frequency.”

This report includes material from the Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to LA City Council bans high-capacity ammunition magazines: Can they do that?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2015/0729/LA-City-Council-bans-high-capacity-ammunition-magazines-Can-they-do-that
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe