Skip to footer

Olympics in #Boston2024: A great idea or a terrible mistake?

Boston won the American bid for the 2024 Olympic Games. But would another win actually be a loss?

|
Winslow Townson/AP
Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, left, shakes hands with Boston Mayor Martin Walsh during a news conference in Boston after Boston was picked by the USOC as its bid city for the 2024 Olympic Summer Games.

Now that Boston has won the U.S. bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics, people are taking to social media with their celebratory cheers and their immediate skepticism.

On Thursday, the US Olympic Committee selected Boston—over San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Washington D.C.—for the American bid, a decision that has Boston officials “wicked excited” for the future. One of the reasons Boston was selected for the bid is that the plan states that no public tax dollars have been spent or will be used to build venues or pay for operations, resulting in a more financially viable Games. Boston Mayor Marty Walsh and Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker stated that the bidding process will be the most transparent in Olympic history. On Friday, they announced the schedule for the first nine community meetings around the city, designed to include residents in the process.

Residents, however, are already feeling jolted and disincluded from the process. Many have taken to using #Boston2024 on Twitter to voice their concerns, and skeptics have aired many concerns, including Boston’s lack of infrastructure, poor transportation, and inefficient housing. Critics are also skeptical of the plan to avoid the usage of public tax dollars, considering the average overrun cost for staging the Olympics is 200 percent.

The International Olympic Committee will choose 2024's host city in 2017. That means Boston has two years to convince the committee—and the city—that it is the best candidate for the Games.

What do you think: Is #Boston2024 a good idea? We took to Twitter to hear your thoughts.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Olympics in #Boston2024: A great idea or a terrible mistake?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2015/0110/Olympics-in-Boston2024-A-great-idea-or-a-terrible-mistake
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe