Can California change US cars forever? New zero-emissions rules take aim.

California has adopted new rules that require 15 percent of all cars sold in the state to be electric, plug-in hybrid, or hydrogen-powered by 2025. Perhaps surprisingly, automakers are onboard.

|
Mark Blinch/REUTERS/File
Plug-in hybrids like this Toyota Prius hybrid at the North American International Auto show in Detroit could be in much greater demand in California because of new emissions rules adopted there Friday.

Confirming its role as a national trend-setter on auto emissions, California passed stringent new standards Friday intended to boost the production and sale of electric and hybrid vehicles here and nationwide. 

The new rules passed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) mandate that 15 percent of new cars sold in the state by 2025 run with zero emissions or near-zero emissions. The result would be some 1.4 million electric, plug-in hybrid, and hydrogen cars on California roads within 13 years. Today, there are 10,000 such vehicles in the state.

Critics such as auto dealers note that California has attempted to spur sales of zero-emissions vehicles before and failed. The current effort, they add, could also fail if zero-emissions vehicles remain so expensive that average car buyers cannot afford them.   

But national carmakers have been largely supportive of CARB's efforts, and California's influence as the most populous state and a major car market could drive development of low- and zero-emission cars that echoes coast to coast.

“It’s definitely a big deal, very progressive and moving in the right direction,” says Nabil Nasr, director of the Center for Integrated Manufacturing Studies (CIMS) at Rochester Institute of Technology.

Environmentalists were understandably elated. In addition to the goals for zero-emission automobiles, the new CARB rules rein in emissions from conventional cars. By 2025, smog-producing pollutants must be cut by 75 percent and greenhouse-gas emissions by 50 percent compared with today's levels. 

“This is a very powerful and history-making moment in which California is pushing the US and the world toward pollution-free cars,” says Vickie Patton, general counsel for the Environmental Defense Fund. “It’s a trifecta for America’s economy, competitiveness and security that depletes our dependence on foreign oil, protects human health, and saves families money during a devastating economic downturn.”

CARB's data suggest the move is a net positive for consumers. The board estimates that car prices will increase by as much as $1,900 because of the new rules, but consumers will save $6,000 in fuel costs over the life of the car by 2025, CARB estimates. 

But auto dealers worry that the cost estimates are too low, and that the new rules could simply mandate the production of expensive cars that consumers won't have the money to buy.

At two days of public hearings in Los Angeles, several industry officials noted that back in 1990, California required that 10 percent of new cars sold in the state by 2003 be zero-emission. But battery technology didn’t develop fast enough, so consumers didn’t buy enough and CARB had to water down its mandate. 

By making a law ahead of existing technology again , the cost of meeting the mandate could indeed drive costs up for consumers, says Dr. Nasr of CIMS.

“Hopefully the economy will do better and companies will invest in R&D to produce what is needed,” he says. “But if there are any glitches in funding or design with the needed technological advances, you might find a hiccup that will make this not very economical.”

CARB head Mary Nichols told reporters the rules include a midterm review in 2017-2018, in which car companies can present data on what consumers are buying, with the possibility that rules may be tweaked.

The oil industry, meanwhile, is concerned about mandates that will force some gas stations to offer hydrogen. 

“We are OK with the idea of developing a non-mandated approach for small business owners who need some incentive to invest at the early stages of a new technology,” says Cathy Reheis-Boyd of Western States Petroleum Association.

But installing hydrogen-delivery technology costs about $1 million per station, and requiring 100 stations statewide to do it is too onerous. “We reject the idea of making them do it,” she says. 

For their part, CARB members are encouraged by the support they have gotten from industry officials. Oil companies and the auto industry sued the state to stop the 1990 rules. This time, some asked for small tweaks but mentioned specifically that they agree with the overall goals.

“The most heartening aspect of this process is how far we’ve come.… The level of consensus is the highest I’ve ever seen,” she said.

Auto companies “have seen the handwriting on the wall," she said. "This really is a whole new chapter with the car in California, the US, and across the globe.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Can California change US cars forever? New zero-emissions rules take aim.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/0127/Can-California-change-US-cars-forever-New-zero-emissions-rules-take-aim
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe