The 800 phonemes of the tiniest linguists

New research helps explain how infants acquire language skills – by losing their ability to discriminate sounds they don’t need.

|
Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press/AP
An infant grabs the nose of Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne at the Youville Center in Ottawa.

Searching for videos of parents baby-talking to their little ones may sound only marginally more respectable than checking out cat videos as a workday pursuit.

But I had to go looking after reading a recent piece in Scientific American by Patricia K. Kuhl called “Baby Talk,” about how infants learn to talk – “a mastery,” she notes, “that occurs more quickly than any complex skill acquired during the course of a lifetime.” 

She discusses fascinating new research into the “sensitive period” of just a few months, beginning at age 6 months, when infants are “most open to learning the sounds of a native tongue,” as Professor Kuhl, of the University of Washington, explains it. Vowels come first; consonants follow some three months later. By the time the window closes, infants have “acquired” the phonemes of their mother tongue. The window stays open longer for infants exposed to two languages.

Phonemes are the building blocks of a language. The sound of “b” in “baby” is a phoneme in English; ditto the hard consonant at the beginning of “cat” or “kitten.” So is each of the “long vowels,” plus their “short” counterparts, and a handful of diphthongs, such as the “ou” of “couch.”

Merriam-Webster explains a phoneme as “the smallest unit of speech that can be used to make one word different from another word.”

A child who can tell a “lake” from a “rake,” or a pork “chop” from a potato “chip,” shows mastery of phonemes.

Linguists estimate that the world’s languages use 800-plus phonemes. Any given language will use only a subset of these, typically a few dozen.

But in their sensitive period, infants are “citizens of the world,” as Kuhl calls them, able to “discriminate” all 800 phonemes. As they listen to the world around them, they track, like tiny statisticians, the sounds they hear. 

Kuhl writes, “Children between eight and 10 months of age still do not understand spoken words. Yet they are highly sensitive to how often phonemes occur – what statisticians call distributional frequencies. The most important phonemes in a given language are the ones spoken most.” 

This is where “parentese” comes in – that high-pitched, singsong patter sometimes simply called “baby talk.” Yes, it sounds silly, but it furnishes “daily lessons in the intonations and cadences of the baby’s native tongue,” Kuhl writes. 

It goes across cultures, but content varies. English-speakers expose their infants to lots of “r’s” and “l’s,” for instance; Japanese parents, not so much, because those sounds matter less in Japanese. And Kuhl’s lab has found that, at age 6 to 8 months, Japanese and American infants are about equal in ability to discriminate “la” from “ra”; four months later, Japanese babies lose their ability to make this distinction, but Americans gain.

This transformation of “citizens of the world” into what Kuhl calls “language-bound listeners” is a bit of a downer: It involves letting go of literally hundreds of possibilities. But it anchors children to the sounds of their mother tongue.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The 800 phonemes of the tiniest linguists
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Verbal-Energy/2016/0128/The-800-phonemes-of-the-tiniest-linguists
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe