Back of the box recipes from Great-Grandma? Family treasure.

I longed for sentimental family heirlooms – until I learned that pragmatism is inheritance, too. 

|
Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff
Recipes written on yellowed index cards fan out from an old family recipe box.

The mother of one of my son’s friends is taking a chocolate chip cookie from my open Tupperware, and I’m backpedaling.

“It’s from the back of the bag,” I say.

“It’s been in our family for generations,” my son says at the same time. 

The woman looks confused, so I put my hand on his strawberry-blond hair. “We don’t have any family recipes, remember?”

He gives a dejected nod, and she takes a bite.

At age 9, my son is as fascinated by history as he is unencumbered by its facts. The more he wants something to be true, the more forcefully he will report it. This morning he insisted megalodons and velociraptors were brawling on prehistoric beaches, and this afternoon he tried to sell the Toll House cookie as a piece of family lore. 

He craves heirlooms, provenance. If only there was a piece of antique furniture from a great-aunt, a Civil War saber from a distant cousin. If only there was treasure. There is a set of floral china, pieced together by my grandma from mid-’90s estate sales, but that’s not quite the legacy he yearns for. To his old soul, we’re mostly a profound disappointment: a family that doesn’t keep things.

He’s placed his remaining hopes in my recipe collection. If he can’t have an ancestral chest of gold buried in a hillside, he’d settle for a secret combination of herbs and spices.

And I don’t know what to tell him.

We’re white Midwesterners as far as genealogy websites can see. A nondescript mishmash of Western Europe and Appalachia that might lean a bit toward Ireland. But that doesn’t help much from a culinary perspective. My grandmothers had four and six children, respectively, and husbands who worked more than they parented and parented more than they cooked. Their culinary aesthetic was efficiency. And starch. Lots and lots of starch.

Courtesy of Marilyn Swander
The writer’s great-grandmother, Rosemary (right); her grandmother, Marilyn (center); and her father, Dave (left) are shown in 1965.

The closest thing I can offer my son is a black mini binder I keep stashed above the refrigerator. My great-grandmother, Rosemary, then in her 80s, gave it to me for my 11th birthday. It is filled with recipes, handwritten on half-sized lined paper, organized into blunt categories like “Meat,” “Dessert,” and, more vaguely, “Helps.” It is not, however, filled with family recipes.

Despite its rustic construction, the book isn’t the product of our ancestors’ creative labors in frontier kitchens or cozy Irish cottages. Mostly, it’s the product of Campbell’s soup, mixed with a few 20-minute dinners copied from the back of Bisquick boxes.

“This is a family recipe, right?” my son asked over and over when we flipped through the pages. “This one? This has to be at least a hundred years old, right?”

I had to break it to him that if a dish calls for lime Jell-O and mini marshmallows, it probably didn’t come from the old country.

I get it. I, too, was disappointed to see so little pedigree in those pages as a kid. Like my son, I wanted the gravitas of generations-deep traditions, something to distinguish us from all the other Indiana families I knew.

Instead, I got a lot of ideas for impossible pies.

In fairness, our family does have something approaching a legacy dish. Every Thanksgiving, we confound married-in members with a cold, clumpy delicacy called persimmon pudding.

My great-grandparents’ house – which later became my parents’ house – had a persimmon tree. No doubt Rosemary was gathering its fruits during the Great Depression, and it was still dropping persimmons when I left for college. If any recipe could lend some provenance to my little black binder, it would certainly be the one for persimmon pudding.

Except that recipe is not in the binder. Every November, I make persimmon pudding with a recipe my uncle found on a cottagecore corner of the internet. It tastes right, we agree, and so we can forgive Great-Grandma for not thinking to record our only heritage recipe in my binder – or anywhere, for that matter. After all, persimmon pudding is time-intensive and labor-intensive, and we only make it once a year. 

She’d never offer me anything so impractical.

Over time, that was my peace with the black binder. No, it’s not romantic. There are no images of women I never knew – perhaps with eyes a little like mine, or a reddish tint to their hair – stirring over cast-iron stoves, smiling at the children by their feet. I can’t pull a single page from that book and claim it is the creative work of my great-great-grandmother, or that it is some secret concoction that binds generations of our family together.

But I can look at every page and know these are the recipes my great-grandma actually used.

It’s better than sentiment, in that way. It’s historical record. And it’s a gift I could pick out of a lineup: a practical, simple tool that cost almost nothing and will last as long as I care to use it. It’s exactly the type of gift my great-grandma, stalwart Quaker that she was, gave to the people who mattered most.

Values are heirlooms, too. I suspect my son will get more mileage out of some inherited thrift than from the inherited pirate treasure of his dreams, but it will be up to him to decide what endures. For now, from his grandmother, he does love a good rummage sale, and from his mother, a good chocolate chip cookie. None of us, from Rosemary down, believe in reinventing the wheel.

So I copied the Toll House recipe into the binder.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Back of the box recipes from Great-Grandma? Family treasure.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/The-Home-Forum/2024/0306/Back-of-the-box-recipes-from-Great-Grandma-Family-treasure
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe