Skip to footer

'Mad Men' creator Matthew Weiner on why the show is relevant to our time

As the final episodes of 'Mad Men' arrive, Weiner says, 'Part of the message of the show was that the characters' lives are very similar to what yours are. They have the same problems, no matter what is going on historically.' 'Mad Men' stars Jon Hamm, Elisabeth Moss, and Christina Hendricks, among others.

|
Jaimie Trueblood/AMC/AP
'Mad Men' stars Elisabeth Moss (l.), Jon Hamm (center), and Rich Sommer (r.).
  • By Jill Serjeant Reuters

Don Draper's gray business suit and trademark fedora have found a home in the Smithsonian Museum of American History, and the Sixties are drawing to a close.

It's the end of an era for "Mad Men," the slow-burning, Emmy award-winning TV series. The AMC cable network show became a pop culture phenomenon and inspired a revival of the fashion and decor of a tumultuous decade.

Eight years after it arrived on U.S. television, the tale of troubled advertising genius Draper and the men and women around him draws to a close on April 5 with Part 2 of the seventh and final season.

The show's creator Matthew Weiner says the season's title, "The End of an Era," is designed to entice, in more ways than one.

"I was interested by the irony that the period is ending in the show, and the period is ending that the show was on," Weiner told Reuters.

"With all the clichés about the turbulent Sixties and all the changes that went on, part of the message of the show was that the characters' lives are very similar to what yours are. They have the same problems, no matter what is going on historically," he said.

And there are problems aplenty for twice-married Draper (Jon Hamm), his mousy one-time secretary turned executive Peggy Olson (Elisabeth Moss), and sassy divorcee Joan Harris (Christina Hendricks).

Back on top, and fabulously wealthy after selling the ad agency to a rival when the first half of the split seventh season ended in May 2014, Draper and friends seem no happier with their lot.

"The tone is dark, but maybe it seems familiar. I think the difference is that everyone's older and that lessons should have been learned and it seems as though they might not be. I think that will have consequences," Hamm told Reuters.

"There are two ways to go. Up or down, and we'll see," he added obliquely.

Known for the unusual secrecy surrounding its plots, no one involved in the show is giving away how the series ends. That has not stopped fans from speculating on scenarios ranging from Draper's death to a blissful Don and Peggy romance.

One trailer released by AMC suggests that the characters move into the mid-1970s.

Unlike some TV writers, Weiner had not mapped out a specific ending when he first came up with the concept of "Mad Men."

"When I was trying to sell the show, I had an idea that it could end in a certain way. But how it happened? That happened three or four years ago. It was like an aha moment," he said.

Weiner hopes the core TV audience of 5 million or so viewers will be happy, but Hamm says you can never please everyone.

"There needs to be one person who really likes the ending, and that's the guy that writes it... Matt was given the ability to end it the way he wanted to. I hope people like it. I don't want to be part of something that people hate, but I don't think anything is 100 percent either way," Hamm said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to 'Mad Men' creator Matthew Weiner on why the show is relevant to our time
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/TV/2015/0403/Mad-Men-creator-Matthew-Weiner-on-why-the-show-is-relevant-to-our-time
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe