Can the Grammys finally do right by Black artists?

|
Andrew White/Parkwood Entertainment/Disney +
The visual album “Black Is King” is helping to propel Beyoncé (center) to this year’s March 14 Grammy ceremony, where she is nominated for nine awards.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 3 Min. )

When the Grammy nominees were announced back in November, some news outlets noted the inclusion of more women and Black artists. Beyoncé, propelled by her “Lion King”-inspired visual album “Black Is King,” leads this year’s nominations with a total of nine. Other Black artists vying for awards on March 14 include Megan Thee Stallion, Brittany Howard, and Michael Kiwanuka. 

That progress was quickly overshadowed, however, by other events, including the glaring omission of The Weeknd and his highly successful fourth studio album, “After Hours.” Perhaps chart positions shouldn’t be a factor in the nomination process, but it is rare that Billboard’s No. 1 song of the year isn’t nominated in any Grammy category. This week he announced he is boycotting the Grammys moving forward.

Why We Wrote This

Music is universal – all cultures create it. Our columnist wonders if the Grammy Awards, airing this Sunday, can move beyond a pattern of exclusion to honor that diversity.

The consistent criticism of the Recording Academy arises from stats like this one: Only 10 Black artists have won the album of the year award since the first one was handed out in 1959.

Grammy voters have yet another chance to do right by Black musicians this year – but will they?

There’s a reason Beyoncé is considered music royalty. Queen Bey leads this year’s Grammy nominations with a total of nine. She is the most nominated female artist in the history of the Grammys, and her “Lion King”-inspired visual album “Black Is King” is the main force propelling her to the ceremony on March 14. One of the album’s biggest singles, “Black Parade,” is a contender for record of the year, best R&B performance and song, and song of the year. Other Black artists up for awards include Megan Thee Stallion, Nas, Freddie Gibbs, Doja Cat, Chika, Kaytranada, Brittany Howard, and Michael Kiwanuka. 

Some news outlets noted the Recording Academy included more women and Black artists when the nominees were announced in November. But that progress was quickly overshadowed.

The Weeknd and his highly successful fourth studio album, “After Hours,” was completely shut out – a glaring omission. The album’s biggest single, “Blinding Lights,” was the most streamed song of the year for 2020 on Spotify and became the longest running top 5 and top 10 record on Billboard’s Hot 100 chart. 

Why We Wrote This

Music is universal – all cultures create it. Our columnist wonders if the Grammy Awards, airing this Sunday, can move beyond a pattern of exclusion to honor that diversity.

Perhaps chart positions shouldn’t be a factor in the nomination process, but it is rare that Billboard’s No. 1 song of the year isn’t nominated in any Grammy category. Industry insiders speculated that he was being penalized for appearing to prioritize his Super Bowl performance on Feb. 7 over the Grammy Awards show, which was originally slated for Jan. 31. After the nominees were revealed, The Weeknd took to social media. “The Grammys remain corrupt. You owe me, my fans and the industry transparency...” he wrote on Twitter. 

His decision to boycott the Grammys – which he announced in a New York Times article this week – only reiterates the distrust many Black artists have toward the Recording Academy as a whole: “Because of the secret committees,” he told the paper, “I will no longer allow my label to submit my music to the Grammys.” 

Other musicians also took issue with the nominations. In January, a group of white artists – Alastair Moock & Friends, The Okee Dokee Brothers, and Dog on Fleas – who were nominated for best children’s music album penned an open letter to the Recording Academy requesting that their names “be removed from final round ballots.” 

They wrote that they couldn’t “in good conscience benefit from a process that has – both this year and historically – so overlooked women, performers of color, and most especially black performers.” The academy subsequently agreed that the category lacked diversity and honored the artists’ request, according to Billboard Magazine. 

The consistent criticism of the academy arises from stats like this one: Only 10 Black artists have won the album of the year award since the first one was handed out in 1959. Grammy voters have yet another chance this year to do right by Black musicians – but will they?

When the cultural zeitgeist trained its sights on racial reckonings last summer, the Grammys weren’t exempt from the heat. In June, the Recording Academy announced changes including renaming the best urban contemporary album category to best progressive R&B album – an apparent rethinking of the word “urban,” which more people in the industry are saying is racially insensitive. 

Earlier in 2020, Harvey Mason Jr., chairman and interim president and CEO, acknowledged in a statement the institution’s shortcomings related to race, foreshadowing some of the year’s efforts: “Too often, our industry and Academy have alienated some of our own artists – in particular, through a lack of diversity that, in many cases, results in a culture that leans towards exclusion rather than inclusion.”

Later, in November, the best world music album category was changed to best global music album to find “a more relevant, modern, and inclusive term,” according to the Recording Academy. Despite implementing diversity initiatives in the past year, including hiring a diversity and inclusion officer, the awards remain dogged by a history that refuses to give Black musicians their due.

It wasn’t until 1989, at the 31st Grammy Awards, that rap was given a category, for example. Artists like Beyoncé, Drake, and Kanye West – despite having crossover success, astronomical album sales, and groundbreaking artistry – are almost always relegated to R&B and rap categories. And legend Aretha Franklin won 18 Grammys throughout her career – but was never nominated in the top four categories. 

Today, we must pay attention to the current state of the institution as well as its origins. It was founded in 1957 – just three years after the start of the civil rights movement – and from its inception awarded white men its highest honors. Fast-forward six decades, and the most prestigious accolade in music has yet another chance to show just how the creativity of Black people fuels and molds the industry – but it probably won’t. There is currency in exclusion and outrage, and so far the Grammy Awards never miss the opportunity to seize it.

Candace McDuffie is the author of the recently released book “50 Rappers Who Changed the World.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Can the Grammys finally do right by Black artists?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Music/2021/0312/Can-the-Grammys-finally-do-right-by-Black-artists
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe