Oscars boycott prompts plan for sweeping changes to Academy

Film academy President Cheryl Boone Isaacs, announced sweeping changes including a goal of women to comprise 48 percent of its approximately 6,000 members and "diverse groups" at least 14 percent.

|
(Photo by Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP, File)
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences President Cheryl Boone Isaacs, in Beverly Hills, Calif. in February 2015. Since becoming the academy’s first African-American president, Boone Isaacs has prioritized diversifying the academy by inducting a higher rate of minorities in recent years and unveiling a five-year initiative to promote diversity in the industry.

When the Oscar nominations revealed a second consecutive year of all-white acting nominees, it lit a fire under film academy President Cheryl Boone Isaacs, the first African-American to lead the organization.

"I really was disappointed," she said after the Jan. 14 nominations.

That disappointment — and the firestorm of criticism that followed — spawned action. On Friday, Boone Isaacs announced sweeping reforms to the organization that include doubling the number of female and minority members by 2020 and adding new governors to its leadership board.

The academy now aims for women to comprise 48 percent of its approximately 6,000 members and "diverse groups" at least 14 percent as an initial step. Its 51-member board of governors voted unanimously for the changes, which also include limiting members' voting rights to 10 years and expanding recruitment outreach globally.

Boone Isaacs said she is ready to embrace "any and all ways we can increase the conversation about storytelling and how to bring more diverse voices in storytelling into the marketplace."

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences had been working internally to diversify its membership for several years before the "OscarsSoWhite" hashtag trended on Twitter following the all-white slate of acting nominees last year, she said. The organization invited 322 new members to join last year, with an emphasis on women, young people and people of color. The new inductees also included a record number of international filmmakers, she said.

But when last week's all-white acting nominees were announced, Boone Isaacs and her academy colleagues realized it was not enough.

"We all kind of looked at each other and said, 'We need to step this up,' " she said. "That was really important. It needs to be timely. There's a lot of conversation out there. We need to get out there with what we've been talking about internally, but now we have to put it into action. So that is what we did."

Boone Isaacs said she expects the three new seats on its governing board to be filled in the next few weeks.

Other approved academy changes include limiting members' voting status to a period of 10 years, to be extended only if the individual remains active in film during that decade. Lifetime voting rights will be granted only to Academy Award nominees and winners, and to members after three 10-year voting terms. Previously, all active members received lifetime voting rights.

Actor-director Don Cheadle applauded the move, but he said it deals with the symptom rather than the cause.

"(This) has to do with inclusion and access and the ability of people of color, women, minorities to get entry-level positions where you can become someone who can greenlight a movie," he said in an interview with The Associated Press. "So until the product that's being spit out is created at a point where there is more diversity, I don't know that these changes will substantively affect much."

As The Christian Science Monitor reported:

“Undeniably, there has been progress,” says Darnell Hunt, director of the Ralph J. Bunche Center for African American Studies and a professor of sociology at the University of California in Los Angeles. “But [that] progress has not kept up with America. The gap between where we are as a society and the industry is increasing."

“Nirvana would be when the studios and executive suites themselves become diverse,” he adds. “That’s when we’ll say there’s success.”

Boone Isaacs, though, hopes changes at the academy will spread through the Hollywood community and into studios' executive offices.

"This conversation is penetrating everywhere, and that's the good thing," she said. "Certainly right now there's a lot of focus on the academy. But the industry as a whole is listening."

Ava DuVernay, director of last year's best picture-nominee "Selma," tweeted that the changes were "one good step in a long, complicated journey for people of color and women artists."

"Marginalized artists have advocated for Academy change for DECADES," DuVernay wrote. "Actual campaigns. Calls voiced FROM THE STAGE. Deaf ears. Closed minds."

___

Follow AP Entertainment Writer Sandy Cohen at www.twitter.com/APSandy .

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Oscars boycott prompts plan for sweeping changes to Academy
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2016/0123/Oscars-boycott-prompts-plan-for-sweeping-changes-to-Academy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe