'Spotlight' is hard-hitting but has too many journalism tropes

'Spotlight' stars Michael Keaton, Mark Ruffalo, and Rachel McAdams as Boston Globe editors and writers who reported on the Catholic Church sex abuse scandal.

|
Kerry Hayes/Open Road Films/AP
Rachel McAdams as Sacha Pfeiffer (from l. to r.), Mark Ruffalo as Michael Rezendes and Brian d’Arcy James as Matt Carroll in a scene from the film 'Spotlight'

Writer-director Tom McCarthy’s “Spotlight” puts the high beams on the Boston Globe’s 2002 exposé of the Roman Catholic Church’s institutional protection of sexually abusive priests. Michael Keaton plays the paper’s investigative-team leader, and other good actors, including Mark Ruffalo, Rachel McAdams, Stanley Tucci, Liev Schreiber, Brian d’Arcy James, and Neal Huff, also make their marks.

The film is often straightforward and hard-hitting. But it plays out all the usual tropes of the investigative-journalism genre – the hot tips, the clandestine meetings, the hand-wringing about ethics, etc. – without adding a jot of novelty. Grade: B (Rated R for language, sexual references.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Spotlight' is hard-hitting but has too many journalism tropes
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2015/1106/Spotlight-is-hard-hitting-but-has-too-many-journalism-tropes
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe