Skip to footer

'The Look of Silence' returns to the disturbing story told in 'Act of Killing'

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'Killing' director Joshua Oppenheimer examines again the story of how almost a million Indonesian citizens were killed by the government and its cohorts. This new movie focuses on a man whose brother was killed in the massacres.

|
Courtesy of Drafthouse Films and Participant Media
'The Look of Silence' stars Adi Rukun (a psuedonym) and his mother Rohani (r.).
  • By Peter Rainer Film critic

Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Look of Silence,” although it was filmed at roughly the same time as his 2012 Oscar-nominated documentary, “The Act of Killing,” is a kind of sequel to "Act," which focused on the 1965-66 slaughter of almost a million Indonesian citizens (supposed communists) by the government and its cohorts. Oppenheimer devoted his entire film to the still-unrepentant killers, many of whom remain in power; he gave them free rein to describe in horrifying detail how they massacred their victims. He filmed them acting out scenes from their favorite gangster movies. For the most part, the killers look as if they’re having a high old time. 

For many people, "Act" was a powerful indictment of violence and a work of art. I thought it was unconscionable. Oppenheimer may have thought that by giving these murderers center stage they would expose their bestiality for all to see (except themselves). But what comes across instead is something far more insidious: a showcase for depravity.

“The Look of Silence” is about Adi, a 44-year-old Indonesian optometrist who was born two years after his brother was slaughtered in the massacres. In the course of the film he confronts several of his brother’s killers, all of whom are still living well, a few of them near Adi’s parents’ home. (Both of his parents are quite old – his father, over 100, is no longer aware of his surroundings.) 

My relief in watching this movie, which once again recounts the slaughters in great, almost fetishistic detail, is that at least the victims are allowed a voice this time. But as Adi sits down with one killer after another and gets essentially the same unrepentant responses, I wondered why this material hadn’t been included in “The Act of Killing.” Is it because Oppenheimer wanted to preserve his dubious nonintervention aesthetic? In “The Look of Silence,” we are pulled back into the world of its predecessor, without any real payoff. Adi’s quest, no matter how he and Oppenheimer try to spin it, is inevitably doomed. 

Which is not to say that, for Adi, the quest was not a spiritual necessity. For me, “The Look of Silence” partially atones for its predecessor, but I would hope that this is the last time we are asked to accompany Oppenheimer into this particular heart of darkness. Grade: B- (Rated PG-13 for thematic material involving disturbing graphic descriptions of atrocities and inhumanity.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to 'The Look of Silence' returns to the disturbing story told in 'Act of Killing'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2015/0724/The-Look-of-Silence-returns-to-the-disturbing-story-told-in-Act-of-Killing
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe